"Atheist Chaplain" <abused@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:ipbQj.4774$ko5.2298@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "RogerM" <RogerM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:wbSdnTa7G6IFoozVnZ2dnUVZ_tKinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "Atheist Chaplain" <abused@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:vtaQj.4737$ko5.4254@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> OK ****-knuckle, please point out how this is earning "Noddy" points
>>> when he is not even here ??? and hasn't been for over a week.
>>>
>>> As to him being my "Illustrious Leader" could you please be more
precise
>>> as to your meaning, if you mean do I agree with him that you, Ozone,
>>> jonz and the rest of the "IQ of 3" group are all a bunch of pathetic
>>> morons who wouldn't know the obvious if it came up to you and drove a
>>> blunt object through your chest, then I suppose that could be true,
but
>>> if you think that it is because he somehow miraculously commands
respect
>>> and directs the replies to the "IQ of 3" then your obviously need
>>> something blunt poked through your chest
>>> from memory your the one who started another typical "Lets score Ozone
>>> points" thread with you "Group has already improved....well almost"
>>> post, your one of the few who regularly jumps on the end of an Ozone
>>> post with all the back slapping and circle jerking when ever you think
>>> the poison one has scored a point. the most anyone usually does when
>>> Noddy scores another easy point from the Ozone Coprophagiacs is to
>>> laugh.
>>> I have not had to jump to the defence of Noddy or anyone else here
>>> because there is no need, you lot are just to easy to shoot down in
>>> flames and lets face it, Ozone, jonz and the rest of the Ozone
>>> anilinguists are in so many bozo bins they make LeTurd look like Mr
>>> popularity.
>>>
>>
>> FFAAAARRRRKK!! I hope you think that crap was worth it your end. Just a
>> ****ing laugh this end, not with you but at you, you poor ****.
>>
>> Roger
>>
>
> keep dreaming :-)
>
> after all its all you have left
>
> BTW I noticed you didn't try and correct or respond to any of my
comments,
> would that be because, unlike your master, you know when you cannot
defend
> the indefensible ?? or would that be because you think its easier to
laugh
> at someone rather than to correct your own shortcomings ??
>
It looks like I'm the only one laughing in this discusion....go figure you
sad sack.
Roger
|
