by "RainbowWarrior" <anemailaddress@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Apr 25, 2008 at 02:50 AM
"Peter Jason" <pj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:furbh1$2sjg$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The advantages of top posting are that one is spared the tedium of
reading
> all the verbiage underneath.
>
> Then it is easier to answer the question the OP *should* have asked.
Yep so you can answer without having a clue what the current branch of
tthe
thread is about? :P
Mid-Posting is better :P
>
> "TG'sFM" <suvvdj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:2cd4857c-6710-4f9a-a35d-a07d156d1df2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Apr 25, 5:35 am, Polly the Parrot <flatulantdi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:20:23 -0700 (PDT) "TG'sFM" <suv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > > I don't have any decendants (at least not yet).
>>> > > But I do have an ancestor that was at Galipolli :-)
>>>
>>> > That probably explains why you are a top poster.
>>>
>>> Where did he/she top post?
>>
>> Well you'd hardly call it a bottom post would you? There is never
>> ever any justification to leave ANY of the other persons text below
>> what you type - never. To do so, you will be labelled a top poster,
>> and always risk of having your access privilages revolked.
>
>
