by atec77 <atec77NOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Apr 25, 2008 at 01:13 PM
RainbowWarrior wrote:
> "Peter Jason" <pj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:furbh1$2sjg$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> The advantages of top posting are that one is spared the tedium of
reading
>> all the verbiage underneath.
>>
>> Then it is easier to answer the question the OP *should* have asked.
>
> Yep so you can answer without having a clue what the current branch of
tthe
> thread is about? :P
Seems like feckless loads of people do
>
> Mid-Posting is better :P
>
>
>> "TG'sFM" <suvvdj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
news:2cd4857c-6710-4f9a-a35d-a07d156d1df2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Apr 25, 5:35 am, Polly the Parrot <flatulantdi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:20:23 -0700 (PDT) "TG'sFM" <suv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I don't have any decendants (at least not yet).
>>>>>> But I do have an ancestor that was at Galipolli :-)
>>>>> That probably explains why you are a top poster.
>>>> Where did he/she top post?
>>> Well you'd hardly call it a bottom post would you? There is never
>>> ever any justification to leave ANY of the other persons text below
>>> what you type - never. To do so, you will be labelled a top poster,
>>> and always risk of having your access privilages revolked.
>>
>
>
