On Apr 25, 8:58 pm, "Gilgamesh" <gilgam...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "TG'sFM" <suv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:837f9e0c-b628-4368-ac36-2150501fda4e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > On Apr 25, 6:06 pm, "Gilgamesh" <gilgam...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> "TG'sFM" <suv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>>news:2af74a99-53cc-4dab-a841-41803924deb5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > On Apr 25, 1:49 pm, "Mr.T" <MrT@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> "Polly the Parrot" <flatulantdi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> >> >> messagenews:20080425121256.08a54e77@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >> > On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:12:11 +1000 "Peter Jason"
<p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >> > wrote:
>
> >> >> > > The advantages of top posting are that one is
> >> >> > > spared the tedium of reading all the verbiage
> >> >> > > underneath.
>
> >> >> > No advantage at all.
>
> >> >> Or to put it another way, no disadvantage either.
> >> >> (actually I think having to scroll down just to read a few new
lines,
> >> >> (for
> >> >> those who can remember what has been written at least), IS a
> >> >> disadvantage.
> >> >> But everyone is free to post however they wish. There are more
> >> >> im****tant
> >> >> windmills to tilt at IMO.
>
> >> > If by your own admission, there are more im****tant windmills to
tilt,
> >> > then why is it too hard for some to just tow the line and do what's
> >> > right? Top posting is NOT the end of the world, but it's the
accepted
> >> > practise, and it's the height of ignorance and disrespect to do
> >> > otherwise - especially on Anzac day. Some of our forefathers gave
> >> > their lives to give these top posters the freedom to do what they
want
> >> > - and unfortunately this includes top posting. Please don't let
all
> >> > these diggers lives be lost in vain. Do the right thing.
>
> >> This from the person who called my grandfather a coward. A person
who
> >> served at Gallipoli in the Field Ambulance risking his life on a
daily
> >> basis
> >> going up to the front line to bring the wounded back for treatment.
And
> >> you
> >> did it on ANZAC day.
>
> > I never said any such thing. If you can't comprehend a simple post,
> > then that's not my problem.
>
> You said - and I quote.
> "Did your ancestor surrender to the enemy?"
>
> If you don't remember what you post then that's not my problem
Yes I remember. But what I'm having problems with is HOW you
translate someone surrendering to the enemy as being a coward? You do
know there are a lot of ex POW's in Australia. Are you calling all of
them cowards? And to think you THINK your grandfather would be proud
of you. I can tell you right now, he would NOT be proud of you
calling POW's cowards.


|