On Apr 26, 7:29=A0pm, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Zapkvr <ke...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On Apr 25, 9:16 pm, "TG'sFM" <suv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Apr 25, 8:58 pm, "Klompmeester" <whowh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>> "TG'sFM" <suv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>>>news:c13f4576-3293-4455-a356-1343dc63126d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>> On Apr 25, 1:49 pm, "Mr.T" <MrT@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>> "Polly the Parrot" <flatulantdi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> >>>>> messagenews:20080425121256.08a54e77@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>>>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:12:11 +1000 "Peter Jason"
> >>>>>> <p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> The advantages of top posting are that one is
> >>>>>>> spared the tedium of reading all the verbiage
> >>>>>>> underneath.
>
> >>>>>> No advantage at all.
>
> >>>>> Or to put it another way, no disadvantage either.
> >>>>> (actually I think having to scroll down just to read a few new
> >>>>> lines, (for
> >>>>> those who can remember what has been written at least), IS a
> >>>>> disadvantage.
> >>>>> But everyone is free to post however they wish. There are more
> >>>>> im****tant windmills to tilt at IMO.
>
> >>>> We have laws in this country for a reason. If you want to live in a
> >>>> lawless society, I suggest you go live in the wild wild west.
>
> >>> There is law and then there is justice.
>
> >>> The law is worthless if there is no justice.
>
> >> Are you suggesting that those who disrespect the law should run the
> >> place? Because in this small world of usenet, it seems that may be
> >> the case.
> > When did "disrespect" become a verb F.F.S?
>
> Long time ago, before FFS showed up, actually.
>
> http://onelook.com/?w=3Ddisrespect-
Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
verb informal, chiefly N. Amer. show a lack of respect for
I might have known.
So it's not a verb really after all.
|
