Zapkvr <kevin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>> Zapkvr <ke...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>> TG'sFM <suv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>> Klompmeester <whowh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>>> TG'sFM <suv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>>>> Mr.T <MrT@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>>>>> Polly the Parrot <flatulantdi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>>>>>> Peter Jason <p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>>>>>>> The advantages of top posting are that one is spared
>>>>>>>>> the tedium of reading all the verbiage underneath.
>>>>>>>> No advantage at all.
>>>>>>> Or to put it another way, no disadvantage either.
>>>>>>> (actually I think having to scroll down just to read a few new
lines,
>>>>>>> (for those who can remember what has been written at least), IS
>>>>>>> a disadvantage. But everyone is free to post however they wish.
>>>>>>> There are more im****tant windmills to tilt at IMO.
>>>>>> We have laws in this country for a reason. If you want to live
>>>>>> in a lawless society, I suggest you go live in the wild wild west.
>>>>> There is law and then there is justice.
>>>>> The law is worthless if there is no justice.
>>>> Are you suggesting that those who disrespect the law should run the
place?
>>>> Because in this small world of usenet, it seems that may be the case.
>>> When did "disrespect" become a verb F.F.S?
>> Long time ago, before FFS showed up, actually.
>> http://onelook.com/?w=disrespect
> verb informal, chiefly N. Amer. show a lack of respect for
> I might have known.
> So it's not a verb really after all.
Pity about what the Macquarie has to say about that.
And how odd that your FFS doesnt even get a mention.
|
