On Apr 28, 7:12=A0am, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Zapkvr <ke...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>
>
>
>
>
> > Rod Speed <rod.speed....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >> Zapkvr <ke...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >>> TG'sFM <suv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >>>> Klompmeester <whowh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >>>>> TG'sFM <suv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >>>>>> Mr.T <MrT@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >>>>>>> Polly the Parrot <flatulantdi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >>>>>>>> Peter Jason <p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >>>>>>>>> The advantages of top posting are that one is spared
> >>>>>>>>> the tedium of reading all the verbiage underneath.
> >>>>>>>> No advantage at all.
> >>>>>>> Or to put it another way, no disadvantage either.
> >>>>>>> (actually I think having to scroll down just to read a few new
lin=
es,
> >>>>>>> (for those who can remember what has been written at least), IS
> >>>>>>> a disadvantage. But everyone is free to post however they wish.
> >>>>>>> There are more im****tant windmills to tilt at IMO.
> >>>>>> We have laws in this country for a reason. If you want to live
> >>>>>> in a lawless society, I suggest you go live in the wild wild
west.
> >>>>> There is law and then there is justice.
> >>>>> The law is worthless if there is no justice.
> >>>> Are you suggesting that those who disrespect the law should run the
p=
lace?
> >>>> Because in this small world of usenet, it seems that may be the
case.=
> >>> When did "disrespect" become a verb F.F.S?
> >> Long time ago, before FFS showed up, actually.
> >>http://onelook.com/?w=3Ddisrespect
> > verb informal, chiefly N. Amer. show a lack of respect for
> > I might have known.
> > So it's not a verb really after all.
>
> Pity about what the Macquarie has to say about that.
>
> And how odd that your FFS doesnt even get a mention.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I'd rather be a pedant than a git.
|
