Re: What's wrong with this?

George W. Frost wrote:
> "TG'sFM" <suvvdj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:b330e9f3-6444-49ce-9f21-3639fd6a3cb7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Apr 30, 9:35 am, ray <ferre...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> TG'sFM wrote:
>>>> On Apr 30, 9:17 am, David Springthorpe <GordonLightfoot...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=454750
>>>> I know what's wrong with it.  The last line says it was a 'white
brick
>>>> home'.  How can you have white bricks?  The process of firing them in
>>>> the kiln would darken them.
>>> Calcil bricks popular in the 1970s were white. That is, if you're into
>>> bricks. Besser also produced similar textured bricks in various
shapes,
>>> types and colours. Apart, of course, from just painting the bludgers.
>>> Cheers,
>>>         Ray
>> If the house was painted, they should have said the 'white painted
>> home'.
> 
> But they didn't, they said a white brick home
> 
> There are thousands of homes around with white bricks and not painted
> actually, they were a very light shade of grey 

White bricks in my apartment building basement. I think
they painted them.

I don't like black bricks.