Bernd Felsche wrote:
> the_dawggie <the_dawggie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> I have not driven the SHT or Bridge for possibly 1.5
>> months.
>
>> I just got a couple of notices, yes end of April, in the mail
>> for $13.00 dated Back in Jan.
>
>> I think I'll round file them.
>
>> 7 Mar 2008 E-TOLL MILSONS POINT AUS $100
>
>> 12 Mar 2008 SDRO INFRNGMNT PAYMENT MAITLAND AUS $79
>
>> How ****ing dare they?!?!?!?!?!?
>
> Don't get mad. Get even.
>
>> I'm seriously considerering cancelling the tag, or getting
>> the ****es with them to recalaim my $79.
>
> Send them a friendly letter asking for them to explain why they
> shouldn't be sued for breach of contract.
>
> Attach an invoice for "Detection and re****ting of faulty toll
> processing" at the usual hourly rate. :-) For each incident.
>
> When they refuse to pay within 28 days, send them a reminder and
> advise that overdue payments incur interest and additional
> processing charges.
>
> When they fail to subsequently fail to pay, send them an additional
> invoice for the interest and processing charges, along with a
> statement of outstanding amounts.
>
> When they fail to subsequently fail to pay the full amount, send
> them an additional invoice for the interest accrued on the total
> outstanding and additional processing charges for this third and
> final reminder. Include a statement of account.
>
> Repeat for 6 months... by which time they'll owe you about $1000;
> which means that you can start to take significant legal action
> through the courts to recover the outstanding debt.
The concept is a good one for vexatious purposed but since the other party
did
not enter into any agreement with the claimant before that service was
provided - it wouldn't be enforceable.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**
|
