Trevor Wilson wrote...
> > No, you're not. You are making a claim that contradicts what someone
> > posted in a review of the Nokia N95.
>
> **Let me set you straight:
>
> My comments are SPECIFICALLY related to the 6110 (which I own) and
Ah. I'll have to go back over this thread, if I feel like it, to check
this. My comments were related specifically to the N95 and how the system
charges you. If I recall you responded to those comments and said that
this was bull****.
> (according to a mate who owns one) is similarly equipped. Personally, I
> cannot vouch for the N95, though I trust my mate more than the idiot on
Cnet
> who said this (about the 6110):
Then why did you say taht the Cnet reviewer was full of ****? If you don't
own the N95 then you don't know for sure, do you? After all, your "mate"
may be wrong too.
> **As Roddles explained: Anyone with any nouse can obtain maps for free.
> However, if you want legitemate access, you'll have to pay.
Ah, now we're talking about something different. I was not aware that you
could get maps "illegitimately". Presumably off Bit Torrent or Emule or
whatever.
In any case I don't see that guy's posts. Not interested in whatever
offensive prattle that he has to "offer".
> moronic reviewers at Cnet cannot figure out how to operate the
technology
> the claim to test. Why you would rely on such idiots is beyond me.
I dunno. Who else is there? Some anonymous posters in Usenet, perhaps?
|
