On May 9, 3:57 pm, "Just JT" <JohnnyT...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "jackbadger56" <castl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On May 9, 2:18 pm, "Just JT" <JohnnyT...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> "Snapper" <snapp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> > However, Eastlink, a brand new multilane, modern, state-of-the-art
> >> > divided
> >> > carriageway, hasn't even opened.
>
> >> > So, folks, it IS about revenue.
>
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> ONLY if you **SPEED**. What part of "drive within the limit" don't
you
> >> understand?
>
> > the entire point of the post has, as usual, gone way over your head.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> So since you're the GENIUS, why don't you answer this question:
>
> If speed cameras are all about revenue, why are people who excessively
speed
> GET SUSPENDED from driving? Why not just EMPTY THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS and
> SEQUESTER ALL THEIR WORLD POSSESSIONS?
>
> --
> Waiting.for.an.intelligent.answer.I.await.
The point the OP was trying to make is that the Vic Gov is banking on
there being revenue from speed cameras. The revenue gained from
drivers breaking the law in integral to their budget figures
balancing.
If.I.had.a.dollar.for.every.brain.you.didn't.have.I'd.have.one.dollar.
|
