"jackbadger56" <castle56@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 9, 3:57 pm, "Just JT" <JohnnyT...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "jackbadger56" <castl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > On May 9, 2:18 pm, "Just JT" <JohnnyT...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> "Snapper" <snapp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >> > However, Eastlink, a brand new multilane, modern, state-of-the-art
>> >> > divided
>> >> > carriageway, hasn't even opened.
>>
>> >> > So, folks, it IS about revenue.
>>
>> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> >> ONLY if you **SPEED**. What part of "drive within the limit" don't
you
>> >> understand?
>>
>> > the entire point of the post has, as usual, gone way over your head.
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> So since you're the GENIUS, why don't you answer this question:
>>
>> If speed cameras are all about revenue, why are people who excessively
>> speed
>> GET SUSPENDED from driving? Why not just EMPTY THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS and
>> SEQUESTER ALL THEIR WORLD POSSESSIONS?
>>
>> --
>> Waiting.for.an.intelligent.answer.I.await.
>
> The point the OP was trying to make is that the Vic Gov is banking on
> there being revenue from speed cameras. The revenue gained from
> drivers breaking the law in integral to their budget figures
> balancing.
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And that, in a nutshell, is THE FAULT of motorists who INSIST on breaking
the law.
--
Get.those.maroons.where.it.hurts.the.most:.the.pocket!!!
|
