Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Australian Drivers and Their Cars > Re: Theftlink?
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 101 of 108 Topic 22766 of 23766
Post > Topic >>

Re: Theftlink?

by "Noddy" <me@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 14, 2008 at 02:15 PM

"Phil" <philip.roper@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:cc101a4e-291a-4f42-b521-4282a9e84433@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The aim of the whole speed camera program is to get motorists to
> realise that they are simply not allowed to travel faster than the
> speed limit. Just accept that and you'll be a lot more relaxed.

Some interesting things to consider in the whole speed camera (or, as the 
more friendly name the government likes to call them "road safety camera) 
debate is that Victoria is the only state in the country that *doesn't*
have 
warning signs indicating that cameras are in use in the areas where they
are 
being used, uses private companies with unmarked cars for mobile cameras 
(who have exemptions to park illegally while carrying out their
"business") 
and has camera tolerances set to trigger within the +/-10% error margin of

ADR compliant speedometers of every car sold in Australia up until a
couple 
of years ago.

As a direct result, Victoria's speed camera revenue is greater than that
of 
the rest of the country's combined.

Numerous studies have been carried out by motoring bodies and traffic 
management experts over the years suggesting that the *best* way of making

people comply to speed limits is to have a visible police presence on the 
roads rather than using a hidden camera to send people an infringement 
notice a few days after the event when the have no recollection of what
they 
were doing at the time.

Of course, the government is well aware of this, and also understands that

while more police on the roads would definitely see a reduction in traffic

offences (as well as the side effect of reduced "target of op****tunity" 
crime simply due to the increased police presence)  it would *cost* money 
while leading to a reduction in speed related revenue at the same time.
Thus 
the concern for safety and ensuring that road rules are adhered to is of 
secondary im****tance to that of prosecuting offenders and generating cash.

You want to believe that it's not anything other than a cash cow then good

for you, but you're in a very select minority.

--
Regards,
Noddy.
 




 108 Posts in Topic:
Theftlink?
Snapper <snapper1@[EMA  2008-05-09 13:17:59 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-09 14:18:13 
Re: Theftlink?
jackbadger56 <castle56  2008-05-08 22:24:42 
Re: Theftlink?
atec77 <atec77NOSPAM@[  2008-05-09 15:55:05 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-09 15:57:11 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-09 21:02:46 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-09 21:53:10 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-09 22:06:53 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-09 22:35:18 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-10 00:16:44 
Re: Theftlink?
"The Raven" <  2008-05-09 22:57:50 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-10 00:19:02 
Re: Theftlink?
"George W. Frost&quo  2008-05-09 15:24:08 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-10 09:11:28 
Re: Theftlink?
John McKenzie <jmac_me  2008-05-09 21:49:42 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-10 09:12:27 
Re: Theftlink?
"George W. Frost&quo  2008-05-10 03:00:31 
Re: Theftlink?
John McKenzie <jmac_me  2008-05-11 04:02:55 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-11 20:51:45 
Re: Theftlink?
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-05-09 12:54:59 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-10 00:13:13 
Re: Theftlink?
jackbadger56 <castle56  2008-05-08 23:11:56 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-09 16:31:58 
Re: Theftlink?
Saab C900 Viggenist <c  2008-05-09 08:26:37 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-09 19:45:09 
Re: Theftlink?
jackbadger56 <castle56  2008-05-08 23:35:18 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-09 16:54:43 
Re: Theftlink?
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 01:48:22 
Re: Theftlink?
atec77 <atec77NOSPAM@[  2008-05-09 17:54:57 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-09 20:48:24 
Re: Theftlink?
ausmartin <ausmartin@[  2008-05-09 14:27:02 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-10 11:56:56 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-10 13:19:17 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-10 15:47:26 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-10 17:39:43 
Re: Theftlink?
Sylvia Else <sylvia@[E  2008-05-14 15:09:10 
Re: Theftlink?
"Bobman" <no  2008-05-10 22:14:49 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-10 22:29:03 
Re: Theftlink?
Alan K. <No@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 13:48:34 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-11 18:09:28 
Re: Theftlink?
Alan K. <No@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 18:43:55 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-11 18:53:05 
Re: Theftlink?
Alan K. <No@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 19:25:10 
Re: Theftlink?
Neil Fisher <neil@[EMA  2008-05-12 14:30:41 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-13 09:19:19 
Re: Theftlink?
Neil Fisher <neil@[EMA  2008-05-14 10:00:28 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-14 14:16:39 
Re: Theftlink?
Bernd Felsche <berfel@  2008-05-14 15:19:28 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-14 17:51:32 
Re: Theftlink?
Snapper <snapper1@[EMA  2008-05-25 19:28:38 
Re: Theftlink?
"Kwyjibo" <k  2008-05-25 20:11:43 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-25 20:25:32 
Re: Theftlink?
"Kwyjibo" <k  2008-05-25 20:49:30 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-25 20:54:07 
Re: Theftlink?
"Kwyjibo" <k  2008-05-25 21:04:58 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-25 21:11:26 
Re: Theftlink?
"Kwyjibo" <k  2008-05-25 22:25:11 
Re: Theftlink?
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-05-25 13:30:02 
Re: Theftlink?
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-05-25 13:00:36 
Re: Theftlink?
"Just JT" <J  2008-05-25 23:12:18 
Re: Theftlink?
Sylvia Else <sylvia@[E  2008-05-26 10:16:07 
Re: Theftlink?
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-05-26 11:30:42 
Re: Theftlink?
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-05-26 02:52:38 
Re: Theftlink?
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-05-26 15:00:43 
Re: Theftlink?
jackbadger56 <castle56  2008-05-12 00:20:45 
Re: Theftlink?
Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL  2008-05-13 23:03:50 
Re: Theftlink?
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-05-14 06:13:32 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-14 16:34:05 
Re: Theftlink?
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-05-14 07:50:15 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-14 19:20:15 
Re: Theftlink?
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-05-14 20:30:31 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-14 23:26:43 
Re: Theftlink?
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-05-15 18:16:03 
Re: Theftlink?
"George W. Frost&quo  2008-05-14 14:19:50 
Re: Theftlink?
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-05-15 19:00:47 
Re: Theftlink?
"George W. Frost&quo  2008-05-15 10:17:41 
Re: Theftlink?
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-05-15 10:28:55 
Re: Theftlink?
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-05-15 21:06:25 
Re: Theftlink?
Bernd Felsche <berfel@  2008-05-15 19:58:09 
Re: Theftlink?
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-05-15 22:15:55 
Re: Theftlink?
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-05-15 12:59:30 
Getting into Hot Water (was: Theftlink?)
Bernd Felsche <berfel@  2008-05-16 00:07:51 
Re: Getting into Hot Water
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-05-16 00:22:33 
Re: Theftlink?
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-05-15 12:42:54 
Re: Theftlink?
Bernd Felsche <berfel@  2008-05-15 22:51:13 
Re: Theftlink?
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-05-16 18:07:07 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-14 16:32:41 
Re: Theftlink?
Neil Fisher <neil@[EMA  2008-05-15 08:47:02 
Re: Theftlink?
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-05-15 04:40:08 
Re: Theftlink?
John McKenzie <jmac_me  2008-05-15 13:26:27 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-16 00:33:17 
Re: Theftlink?
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-05-16 00:26:23 
Re: Theftlink?
John McKenzie <jmac_me  2008-05-16 01:09:40 
Re: Theftlink?
John McKenzie <jmac_me  2008-05-09 04:45:49 
Re: Theftlink?
"David Z" <d  2008-05-09 13:28:32 
Re: Theftlink?
John McKenzie <jmac_me  2008-05-09 21:51:32 
Re: Theftlink?
atec77 <atec77NOSPAM@[  2008-05-10 08:12:08 
Re: Theftlink?
Saab C900 Viggenist <c  2008-05-09 08:24:02 
Re: Theftlink?
"Bobman" <no  2008-05-10 22:12:38 
Re: Theftlink?
Phil <philip.roper@[EM  2008-05-13 19:26:06 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-14 14:15:07 
Re: Theftlink?
Sylvia Else <sylvia@[E  2008-05-14 15:32:40 
Re: Theftlink?
"David Z" <d  2008-05-14 11:47:37 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-14 23:29:20 
Re: Theftlink?
"David Z" <d  2008-05-14 14:29:59 
Re: Theftlink?
Bernd Felsche <berfel@  2008-05-15 10:13:17 
Re: Theftlink?
"Noddy" <me@  2008-05-15 13:18:14 
Re: Theftlink?
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-05-15 04:42:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 21:32:58 CDT 2008.