Re: Theftlink?

"Just JT" <JohnnyThor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:48394577$0$4758$9a6e19ea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Kwyjibo" <kwyjibo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> "Just JT" <JohnnyThor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:48393ec3$0$5229$9a6e19ea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> "Snapper" <snapper1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> As for 110 km/h being adequate, adequate for who?
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Those roads were designed for 110kph.
>>
>> Wrong. The layout for the majority of Australian roads was determined 
>> back in the 1800's, when horse and cart was the common mode of
trans****t.
>> I don't recall seeing a horse and cart travelling unassisted at 110km/h

>> lately.......
>>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> The surface and width have been improved since then....

And? That doesn't alter the fact that the layout, which is a key component

of the design, was NOT specified to cope with 110km/h.

> You.clearly.have.no.knowledge.of.road.design.

Quite a bit more than you it would seem. Or are you actually stupid enough

to think that layout does not form a key component of the overall design?

-- 
Kwyj.