Mike Romain <romainm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:47dfd3b3$0$5203$9a6e19ea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Willem-Jan Markerink wrote:
>> Mike Romain <romainm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>
>>>> (and no, this was not spam, Luis actually even replied by email as
>>>> well, on a Usenet-posting from me, dating 1999....:))
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't know about that, he SPAMMED my email for any posts I 'ever'
>>> made about those pieces of junk. They got to be junk if they have to
>>> be SPAMMED. Too bad too, I thought they might have potential. The
>>> thought of a 'new' CJ was enticing.
>>>
>>> Only garbage has to be Spammed to Usenet because it can't be sold in
>>> real life.
>>
>> He isn't selling anything, he offers valuable information for free, in
>> the good tradition of Usenet.
>>
>> And I rather see him mail the info multiple times, for lack of
>> filtering the email-addresses, than none at all.
>>
>
> Come-on.. When a commercial entity searches all of Usenet since the
> 'LAST' century and 'multiple' SPAMS 'every' person that has 'ever'
> posted about what they are trying to sell, that is SPAM at it's worst.
>
> These are the guys they are trying to make illegal with their unwanted
> or unsolicited SPAM.
>
> To me a Spammer 'only' deserves a Boycott at the best. I will never buy
> from a Usenet or even Worse, Email SPAMMER.
You couldn't, even if you wanted, because he isn't selling anything.
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<w.j.markerink@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
|
