Mike Romain <romainm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:47e26ee9$0$15868
$9a6e19ea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Willem-Jan Markerink wrote:
>> Mike Romain <romainm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> news:47dfd3b3$0$5203$9a6e19ea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Willem-Jan Markerink wrote:
>>>> Mike Romain <romainm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>> (and no, this was not spam, Luis actually even replied by email as
>>>>>> well, on a Usenet-posting from me, dating 1999....:))
>>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know about that, he SPAMMED my email for any posts I 'ever'
>>>>> made about those pieces of junk. They got to be junk if they have
to
>>>>> be SPAMMED. Too bad too, I thought they might have potential. The
>>>>> thought of a 'new' CJ was enticing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Only garbage has to be Spammed to Usenet because it can't be sold in
>>>>> real life.
>>>> He isn't selling anything, he offers valuable information for free,
in
>>>> the good tradition of Usenet.
>>>>
>>>> And I rather see him mail the info multiple times, for lack of
>>>> filtering the email-addresses, than none at all.
>>>>
>>> Come-on.. When a commercial entity searches all of Usenet since the
>>> 'LAST' century and 'multiple' SPAMS 'every' person that has 'ever'
>>> posted about what they are trying to sell, that is SPAM at it's worst.
>>>
>>> These are the guys they are trying to make illegal with their unwanted
>>> or unsolicited SPAM.
>>>
>>> To me a Spammer 'only' deserves a Boycott at the best. I will never
buy
>>> from a Usenet or even Worse, Email SPAMMER.
>>
>> You couldn't, even if you wanted, because he isn't selling anything.
>>
> His actions clearly say otherwise.
>
> Only some who is getting paid would be so rabid about searching the
> world from the first days of Google archives to fill our email boxes
> with a blatant commercial post.
>
> Either that or he is just a plain brain dead idiot.
Tell me what he sells then.
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<w.j.markerink@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
|
