Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Antique (2) > Re: Baffling St...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 13 Topic 2089 of 2191
Post > Topic >>

Re: Baffling Straight-8 Timing Problem

by Stude <midlant@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 8, 2007 at 03:37 PM

On Sep 8, 1:11 am, jdhar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working with a friend on his 1931 Marmon 88 straight-8 engine. He
> pulled the fully functional engine about a year ago, had the whole
> thing miked out, replaced all the parts that needed it etc. in prep
> for a rebuild to fix leaks and generally restore the engine. The
> engine is now all back together, and we can get it to turn over and
> run under its own power, but are having some serious complications
> with timing it properly.
>
> The problem we're running into is somewhat complicated and very
> confusing, so I will explain it in detail in the hopes that we get
> some useful advice.
>
> 1. The distributor worked perfectly in the car before the engine tear-
> down. It's a dual-point distributor, and he's getting his
> synchronization equipment ready to double-check, but it was
> synchronized when the thing was taken apart and hasn't been touched
> since.
>
> 2. We have verified that the cam and crank are timed correctly. They
> were installed to spec using the embossed teeth on the timing gears to
> align them for the installation of the timing chain, and we have
> verified that at Cyl. No. 1 TDC (hereafter referred to simply as TDC)
> the intake valve begins to open at exactly TDC on the intake stroke,
> which is exactly as the Marmon manual (which he has, correct to his
> year and model) specifies.
>
> 3. We have verified the firing order against the Marmon manual. I
> believe, off the top of my head, that it is 1-6-2-5-8-3-7-4, but can't
> confirm this- he has the book since it took him about 20 years to find
> one in good condition. In any case, we have verified that the
> distributor cap is wired correctly in that order.
>
> 4. We have verified that the distributor sparks Cylinder No. 1 at just
> before TDC on the power stroke- in other words, we have statically
> timed the engine to two flywheel teeth BTDC for the power stroke
> according to the spec in the manual. We've verified that we're not 180
> degrees out of time (of course, the engine wouldn't run at all if we
> were, but we checked anyway).
>
> So, the problem:
>
> We can get the engine to start and run on its own. The starter motor
> labours intensely to turn the thing over at correct static time, and
> it barely starts and runs very ragged with *lots* of partially-
> combusted gas in the form of black smoke in the exhaust. This is
> frustrating but could be attributed to any number of things, but the
> odd thing is: if we loosen the distributor bracket and *RETARD* the
> timing by approximately 30 degrees of distributor rotation, which
> corresponds (unless I'm mistaken) to 60 degrees ATDC, the engine runs
> much smoother and cleaner, and the starter turns it over easily
> instead of labouring. That's as far as we can retard the timing before
> the condenser hits the retard arm spring screw and we can't turn it
> any more. I would normally think that we should get better performance
> out of the engine by advancing the timing, albeit at the cost of
> hotter and less reliable valves.
>
> Additionally, the more we choke the carb, the easier the thing is to
> start and the better it runs, even with the throttle wide open it runs
> better if we partially block the air intake.
>
> The two "shots in the dark" we're going to take next time we drive the
> 50 miles to where the engine currently lives are a) checking the
> timing with a dynamic timing light to see if it's fla****ng TDC when we
> retard the distributor way past where we think TDC should be, and b)
> checking the synchronization on the points.
>
> Any ideas on what could be causing this? The distance between us and
> the engine makes it inconvenient to go back and forth a lot, so we'd
> appreciate any tips on things to look for when we try again after the
> weekend.
>
> Jon Harvey

It's a quickie and unlikely, but I would stick a probe into cylinder
#1 and make sure that it was sticking up the highest when the
(flywheel?) pointer said that it should be.
In other words, is "TDC" on the timing gauge the same as with the
piston itself?
 




 13 Posts in Topic:
Baffling Straight-8 Timing Problem
jdharvey@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-09-08 08:11:11 
Re: Baffling Straight-8 Timing Problem
mark <bk416@[EMAIL PRO  2007-09-08 01:54:57 
Re: Baffling Straight-8 Timing Problem
Stude <midlant@[EMAIL   2007-09-08 15:37:45 
Re: Baffling Straight-8 Timing Problem
jdharvey@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-09-08 16:47:42 
Re: Baffling Straight-8 Timing Problem
George Patterson <grpp  2007-09-09 00:31:55 
Re: Baffling Straight-8 Timing Problem
Otto Skorzeny <Forrest  2007-09-09 14:55:50 
Re: Baffling Straight-8 Timing Problem
Stude <midlant@[EMAIL   2007-09-09 08:41:03 
Re: Baffling Straight-8 Timing Problem
Otto Skorzeny <Forrest  2007-09-09 16:43:05 
Re: Baffling Straight-8 Timing Problem
Otto Skorzeny <Forrest  2007-09-09 17:11:03 
Re: Baffling Straight-8 Timing Problem
C-BODY@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-09-22 23:24:52 
Re: Baffling Straight-8 Timing Problem
George Patterson <grpp  2007-09-24 01:46:15 
Re: Baffling Straight-8 Timing Problem
Grumpy AuContraire <Gr  2007-10-03 16:12:17 
Re: Baffling Straight-8 Timing Problem
George Patterson <grpp  2007-10-04 03:15:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 20 5:32:32 CDT 2008.