"BlueBuyYoo" <BlueBuyYoo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:fudl7v$3fg$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In <XJqOj.127406$yE1.13605@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Daniel Who Wants to Know"
<danielthechskid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
>
> >"damnnickname" <damnnickname@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >news:6b22ebfc5fbf264378ae0ee40141d957@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> the 92,93,94 and 95 were the best Mini Vans Chrysler had. When the
new
> >> body
> >> style 96's came out they had problems.
> >>
> >> Glenn Beasley
> >>
> >> --
> >> Message posted using
> >> http://www.talkaboutautos.com/group/rec.autos.makers.chrysler/
> >> More information at http://www.talkaboutautos.com/faq.html
> >>
> >>
>
> >Agreed. My '95 GC SE 3.3 is doing just fine with slightly over 225,000
> >miles now and my cousin's '96 GC (not sure about submodel or miles) 3.3
is
> >having lots of issues. As I said before the '92 Dynasty 3.3 made it to
> >252,000 before the spun bearing and it is now waiting to be crushed
which
is
> >kinda sad as it had the rare vinyl roof over the rear window area.
>
> I have a 94 Caravan with about 220,000km and it has been the best
vehicle
I
> have ever owned. It still has the original exhaust, rad, tranny, engine
and
> front end parts. I have had to replace the heater core, starter, rear
shocks,
> water pump and battery over the life of the van (brakes too, of course
;-).
> Very minor oil pan and valve cover leaks.
>
> It is just now starting to rust and the ball joints are starting to
complain.
>
> My wife won't part with it.
>
We have a 94 & 95 T&C, great vans.
Only problem is they suck gas like there's no tomorrow. 15-18Mpg is
pretty
standard for mixed city/highway usage.
Ted


|