MI5, would you PLEASE make this sorry lowlife disappear?!? Maybe work a
deal to get him shipped to Gitmo, Antarctica or the bottom of the
Pacific ocean?
PLEASE!
imiefeviv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> MI5 Persecution: BBC Newscasters Lie & Deny They're Watching. Me
>
> Central to the. persecution campaign waged against me for some nine
years
> now by the Security. Service is their use of the media, and in
particular
> the. broadcast media, to make clear to me that I am under surveillance
and
> being watched within my own. home, even by BBC newscasters while they
read
> the news. This is really an act of arrogance; MI5 and their. tools in
the
> television. and radio are so sure that they can never be caught, that
they
> have many times made explicity clear on broadcast programmes that. they
are
> as capable of seeing me as I am of seeing the broadcast pictures.. Even
> when. they have known I am taping the programmes they still carry on
this
> practice; for examples. of TVand radio presenters caught "in action",
see
> the Evidence area of. my website.
>
> If you wish to reply to this. article......
> then please. include your name and fax number! I provide the means for
> recipients to send me their thoughts on the topics discussed, but. ask
that
> you provide me with your fax number or email address if you require. a
> response. Also would you please send not more than one or. two pages, if
by
> fax.. Thank-you!
>
>
> It started with. a Newscaster, and it continues with Newscasters today
>
> The. very first incident in the story started with a reaction by an ITN
> newscaster, Sue Carpenter, in June of 1990, almost nine. years ago now.
She
> reacted to what she saw in. my living room at home as she read the news.
My
> mother had brought an apple for me. into the room, whereupon the
newsreader
> smirked and giggled, apparently. finding this funny. I couldn't believe
> what I was seeing.. I carried on watching news and other television
> programmes to see if presenters. would show signs of "interactive
> watching"; to my surprise, this happened again and again..
Unfortunately, I
> did not have my wits sufficiently about me to videotape. these
programmes,
> and it is now almost. impossible to obtain recordings dating back to
1990.
>
> However, I have been busy recording everything Ive watched the. last
couple
> of years, and the taping has yielded some nuggets, which you. will find
if
> you point your Web browser at the "evidence" area of my website,. whose
URL
> address is given above. Strangely it is not particularly. the BBC who
are
> "after me" at the moment (with. the exception of occasional fire from
> Nicholas Witchell), but that supposed paragon of virtue and. decency Jon
> Snow of Channel Four TV News (he. actually works for ITN), who once
claimed
> hed turned down MI5s offer of a tax-free salary. I will cover Snows.
recent
> actions in. a future article.
>
> BBCs. Hidden Shame
>
> The first. ever Usenet post (internet newsgroup article) on the subject
of
> the MI5 bugging / BBC. watching occurred, as stated in a previous
article,
> in early May 1995. It. is reproduced here;
>
> Date: Thu May. 4 18:27:24 1995
> Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy
> Subject: BBC's. Hidden Shame
>
> Remember the two-way televisions in George Orwell's 1984? The ones.
which
> watched you back? Which you could never get rid of, only. the sound
could
> be turned. down?
>
> Well the country. which brought Orwell into the world has made his
> nightmare follow into the world after him. Since. 1990 the British have
> been waging war against one of. their own citizens using surveillance to
> invade privacy and a campaign of abuse in the transmitted media in.
their
> efforts. to humiliate their "victim".
>
> I suppose "BBCs Hidden Shame" is more of. a wish than a fact. It may be
> hidden, but the BBC and other media. and security organisations seem to
> have no shame whatever in their. anti-social, not to say criminal,
> actions. Nor do the general public, who seem quite. happy to parrot the
> vilest. obscenities without much hesitation or apparently thought.
>
> Martyn Lewis, Nicholas Witchell and. the rest
>
> Most of the. harassment occurred in 1990-92, when I wasnt making any
> recordings, and the BBC wont release copies of current. affairs
programmes
> from that period.... so although I can remember there were. many
incidents
> in that time, even many specifics, I. cant dig up the actual programmes
to
> flesh out the. bones.
>
> This year, there has been. at least one incident with Nicholas Witchell
as
> newsreader, which I. have successfully recorded and digitized,
> i.e. converted into a computer. Quicktime movie file. This has not yet
> found its way onto my website (Im a busy man, dontcha know). but you can
be
> sure I. will let the readership of these articles know when that clip
makes
> it onto the web. The Witchell clip was recorded on Saturday 10 April.
1999
> at 7pm, and shows Witchell trying to restrain his features. from
collapsing
> into a smirk. First. his upper lip quivers for several minutes, then
with
> the non-excuse of a non-joke his. entire face twists into a grin. It
looks
> as if he finds me so funny, that he allows himself. to submerge any
> pretence at professionalism in a sea of MI5-inspired. sarcasm and
> harassment.
>
> The two BBC newscasters. whose reactions to me I can remember most
vividly
> over the years. are Martyn Lewis and Nicholas Witchell. I can remember
> thinking years ago. that Michael Buerk was also seeing me at home; and
if
> the other two are watching. then there would be no reason why he wouldnt
be
> doing the same; but. in all honesty I cannot remember a single clear
> instance of his reacting through. facial or verbal expression to me.
>
> I can. remember several instances of Martyn Lewis reacting to what he
saw
> of me, however. In early 1992 I was watching the BBC. news with Lewis on
a
> small black-and-white portable TV at my then home in Oxford. I threw. a
> term of abuse. at Lewis; he flinched, then gave a grin and made a
comment
> from which. I understood that he had been on my side, but might have
> changed his mind as a result of what Id just said. to him.
>
> And in spring 1991 I remember Martyn Lewis. clearly reacting to what he
saw
> of. me at my then accommodation in Woking, Surrey, by continuing to
stare
> at some. fixed point near the camera after the news had finished -
> presumably this is where the monitor interactively. showing pictures of
my
> room was. located.
>
> Why would BBC. and other Newscasters Watch and Harass Me, Watching Them?
>
> This is a very difficult. question, and I dont actually know the answer.
It
> is a matter of record. that the Secret Services are very much part of
the
> Establishment. The recent exposure of the. "MI6 Agent List" on the
> internet, and its coverage in the newspapers, reveals how. much MI5 and
MI6
> are recruited from the. ranks of the Establishment. Obviously the
> relationship. is bi-directional; the Establishment influences MI5/MI6,
but
> the secret services (well, perhaps not so secret. now we know who works
for
> MI6!!!) also influence the machinery. of power and information
> dissemination i.e.. media in this country. So they must have a lot of
> covert. leverage with the BBC and ITN.
>
> Some of this leverage is obviously through bribery.. It is a matter of
> record that MI5 tried some years ago to "buy" Jon Snow. of Channel Four
> TV. He turned them down -. obviously they must have approached other
media
> people as well, and from the lack of other reports of. people turning
them
> down, it may be. presumed that some other journalists will have accepted
> the sugared carrots put before them. Ironically, Jon Snow. has been
taking
> part in the recent "watching" actions against me -. but why he has
allowed
> himself to be used by. the secret services is something which I do not
> know.
>
> Perhaps the Security Service. uses blackmail to twist arms of
journalists
> into co-operating with them? I have always thought there. was something
> slightly odd about Martyn Lewiss demeanour. At the time of. the Ron
Davies
> "rough trade" scandal it was reported that MI5 had known all. about
Davies
> predilections and the. sham of his pretence to be a happily married
> man. Perhaps MI5 have been able to dig something. up from Martyn Lewiss
> private life to blackmail him into acting on their behalf?. And if there
> wasnt anything before the "newscaster watching" started. then there most
> certainly is something now..... once theyve started watching, the
> newscasters will surely wish their activities to. remain covered-up, and
> co-operate with. the security service.
>
> "Newscaster Watching" Deliberately. Constructed to Mimic Schizophrenia
>
> Presumably this is the. first case in history of television journalists
> actually taking part in acts of real-time, live spying. and reacting
> against one of their viewers. What you have to understand,. though, is
that
> I was quite mentally healthy. in June 1990, certainly relative to
November
> 1992, when after two and a half years. of harassment I was finally
admitted
> to hospital as an out-patient. MI5 decided from the. outset that they
would
> make me mad;. they constructed the media harassment to resemble what
would
> be reported by a person with mental illness; and then they. carried on
> years of abuse to inflict on. me the condition which they wished to use
as
> an excuse to cover up. their abuses.
>
> I sold my portable TV in. autumn 1990 and stopped watching television
> regularly. I realise now that this may have. been a mistake. What I
should
> have done was to. watch TV and listen to the radio, but tape-record
> everything and make a note. of what each excerpt meant to me. I would
then
> be in a much stronger position. as regards to evidence that I am now.
That
> is what I am trying to do now, but unsurprisingly the. TV/radio
presenters
> have stopped getting at me,. now they know they are being recorded.
>
> When I started publicising my case on internet newsgroups. in 1995, I
was
> met with the disbelief one might expect to be accorded to. a mentally
ill
> person. who talks about "newscaster watching" and media persecution.
Some
> newsgroup participants thought I had started a "troll",. an invention
made
> to. obtain a reaction; one bright spark even suggested a group of
> psychology students were behind the articles.. But most people thought
the
> articles were symptomatic of derangement - and. that is exactly what MI5
> want people to think. MI5 chose me as a target because I was. mildly
> mentally ill at. the outset in 1990, although I stress my illness then
was
> very. mild in comparison with November 1992, and because they knew that
> enough abuse would (a) make me much more seriously ill, and. (b) once I
was
> more ill, they would "get away" with a harassment deliberately.
constructed
> to look like. the symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia.
>
> Martyn Lewis. Denies & Lies, But Wont in Writing
>
> In February 1997. I wrote to BBC Viewer & Listener Correspondence and
asked
> them to investigate the claim that. their newscasters had engaged in
> "real-time spying" on me. They replied that. they had asked Martyn Lewis
> and. Michael Buerk whether they had engaged in such practices, and that
> they had both made verbal denials. to VLC, but were refusing to put
their
> denials in. writing.
>
> To. me it looks as if Lewis and Buerk are happy to lie verbally but not
in
> writing, because written falsehoods would. place them unambiguously in
the
> wrong, whereas they. can try to talk their way out of verbal lies if
they
> are ever caught, or. perhaps even deny the verbal lies completely? If
they
> lie without shame, then why. would they have any shame about future lies
> about. lying?
>
> BBC-VLC also said that the BBC "would never engage in any. form of
> surveillance activity" such as that described. Clearly Martyn Lewis. and
> the rest have lied to their own. organisations personnel about their
> criminal actions. So much for the "objective",. "truthful" BBC, a nest
of
> shabby. liars.
>
> Summons against the BBC, for Nuisance. caused by Newscaster Spying
>
> In March 1997 I issued. a civil summons against the BBC, seeking
injunction
> against further "newscaster spying", and token damages for what the. BBC
> had done to me until that date. The purpose. of the summons was to try
to
> "smoke out" the BBC, since obviously I did not have good evidence. which
> would be necessary for either a civil or criminal case to. be made
against
> them. My. summons was worded as follows;
>
> 1. The plaintiff is and was at. all material times residing at [home
> address]. At some time prior to or during June 1990, persons of. unknown
> identity entered. Plaintiff's premises and installed concealed
television
> equipment in. said premises.
>
> 2. A campaign of harassment was launched against the Plaintiff. by the
> persons of unknown. identity, which in part took the form of instigating
> harassment by. BBC TV newscasters (including specifically Michael Buerk
and
> Martyn Lewis) as. they read news bulletins, by making direct and
personal
> comments. to Plaintiff.
>
> 3. The campaigns purpose was to subject Plaintiff. to great mental
stress
> and. induce mental breakdown. As a result of it Plaintiff did indeed
suffer
> from. severe mental strain in 1990-97.
>
> 4. In order to avoid the mental strain. being caused to him the
Plaintiff
> has been compelled to. stop watching BBC TV news. Defendant therefore
> committed the tort of private nuisance, since normal use of home. was
> interfered. with.
>
> 5. Plaintiff claims a permanent injunction prohibiting. further
nuisance,
> and. damages for nuisance suffered limited to 5,000.
>
> Naturally, my attempt to smoke-out. the BBC and its lying newscasters
> failed. The BBCs litigation. department sought to have my summons struck
> out; and they succeeded in doing so, on the grounds of. my action
> "disclosing no reasonable cause. of action". I was also prevented from
> issuing further civil claims against. the BBC without leave of the
> Court. Apparently litigants-in-person frequently /. usually have their
> claims struck out with this wording, regardless of the. merit of their
> claims.
>
> BBC Suppresses. my Claims of "Watching by Newscasters"
>
> BBCs staff magazine Ariel ran my advert "BBC Newsreaders Spying on. my
> home" for one issue in the Personal category on 8/July/1997. before it
was
> spotted and axed. by editor Robin Reynolds; please see
> webpage;. http://www.pair.com/spook/evidence/plaint/ariel.htm
> Clearly the BBC will not allow claims of its wrongdoing to be made.
public
> in the media channels. it controls.
>
> On several occasions people said to my face that harassment from. the TV
> was happening. On the. first day I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening
in
> the local. pub the Rose and Crown with the company's technical director
> Ian, and Phil, another employee. Ian. made a few references to me and
said
> to Phil, as if in an aside, "Is he the bloke. who's been on TV?" to
which
> Phil replied, "Yes, I. think so".
>
> The reader might think that mere "watching" by newscasters. etc might be
a
> relatively benign. happening. But it is not; it is part of MI5s
framework
> of harassment. and lies. On many occasions the reactions of the BBCs
> newscasters to me has been in the nature. of sarcasm, implicit contempt
and
> abuse. This is visible in Witchells news. programme mentioned above,
where
> he engages in abuse by laughing. at me during his newsreading. It was
> particularly visible in the early period of. 1990-92, and as late as
Autumn
> 1993, when during. a Newsnight broadcast Jeremy Paxman interviewed a
> football person about. soccer hooliganism, and the interviewee gave vent
to
> an unsubtle rant about. "theyre idiots, theyre just idiots, keep up the
> surveillance". Paxman started grinning, showing he understood. and was
> taking part in the abuse being perpetrated on that. programme.
>
> Conclusion
>
> The. MI5 Persecution started with harassment by television newscasters,
and
> today harassment by TV. and radio presenters still forms a key part of
MI5s
> activities against me. When this business started. in June 1990 I was in
> relatively good health. of mind. Years of persecution by the secret
police
> and their mouthpieces in the state-run. BBC and other media eroded my
> health until MI5 achieved their aim. of seeing me rendered mentally ill
in
> November 1992. The diagnosis which. was forced on me unfortunately and
> ironically. meant that my reports of the harassment are disregarded,
> because the mentally ill are second-class citizens in. todays Britain.
>
> Yet. TV and radio harassment continues, albeit in a reduced form,
despite
> my taping all the programmes I watch, resulting in. my being able to
obtain
> and demonstrate objectively on the website. instances of media
presenters
> attacking me. Unfortunately these recorded. instances are quite tenuous;
I
> might understand them, the presenters understand. what it is theyre
doing,
> but. despite many thousands of people knowing the truth of the
"newscaster
> watching", the omerta continues. and they continue to refuse to admit
the
> truth. of the matter. It is a terrible indictment of British society
that
> there is not even. one decent person willing to speak out. I look
forward
> to the day. when the truth does finally emerge, and the mass corruption
> which has allowed the MI5 persecution to take. place is finally purged
and
> the Establishment criminals. caught and appropriately punished.
>
> 5582
>
|
