Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Ford - Explorer > Re: 6 Cyl Econo...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 3 Topic 6301 of 6416
Post > Topic >>

Re: 6 Cyl Economy as bad as 8!

by "C. E. White" <cewhite3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 22, 2008 at 09:04 AM

"Daniel David Palmer" <DDPalmer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:sOadnbCym4PScAjanZ2dnUVZ_rqlnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I am thinking about buying a new Mountaineer to replace my 2003 
>Mountaineer. I currently have the V8 that gets...surprise 
>surprise....13MPG around town and 19 on the road, exactly what the 
>new "real world" sticker rating estimates on new Mountaineers. I 
>noticed that the 6 cylinder doesn't get any better mileage. Why is 
>that? Why buy one? Why does Ford even MAKE one if it can't offer 
>better fuel economy with the reduced power?

Because they can sell the V6 version for less. There is very little 
difference is weight between the V6 and the V8. The driving cycle used 
by the EPA has tightly defined acceleration rates and speeds. There is 
not much difference in engine efficiency, so there really should not 
be much difference in fuel economy. I would expect the V8 to have 
better acceleration, and if you take advantage of that, you will get 
worse fuel economy.

Ed
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
6 Cyl Economy as bad as 8!
Daniel David Palmer <D  2008-01-22 08:21:13 
Re: 6 Cyl Economy as bad as 8!
"C. E. White" &  2008-01-22 09:04:41 
Re: 6 Cyl Economy as bad as 8!
"trailer" <s  2008-01-22 15:11:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 22:03:14 CDT 2008.