Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Ford - Explorer > Re: 6 Cyl Econo...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 3 Topic 6301 of 6401
Post > Topic >>

Re: 6 Cyl Economy as bad as 8!

by "trailer" <st74dummy@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 22, 2008 at 03:11 PM

When I purchased my 2000 Explorer new, I opted for the V8.  The economy has

been pretty good, about 13-15 around town and 18-23 on highway.

I guess they discontinued that V8 (5.0), but if I get another new one I 
wouldn't hesitate to get the v8.

"Daniel David Palmer" <DDPalmer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:sOadnbCym4PScAjanZ2dnUVZ_rqlnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 am thinking about buying a new Mountaineer to replace my 2003
Mountaineer. I currently have the V8 that gets...surprise
surprise....13MPG around town and 19 on the road, exactly what the new
"real world" sticker rating estimates on new Mountaineers. I noticed
that the 6 cylinder doesn't get any better mileage. Why is that? Why buy
one? Why does Ford even MAKE one if it can't offer better fuel economy
with the reduced power?
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
6 Cyl Economy as bad as 8!
Daniel David Palmer <D  2008-01-22 08:21:13 
Re: 6 Cyl Economy as bad as 8!
"C. E. White" &  2008-01-22 09:04:41 
Re: 6 Cyl Economy as bad as 8!
"trailer" <s  2008-01-22 15:11:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 0:57:56 CDT 2008.