Joe wrote:
> Michael Johnson <cds@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:M-mdnbZkR9Wi4znanZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Joe wrote:
>>> Michael Johnson <cds@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>> news:9oqdnWsp9YHwXj7anZ2dnUVZ_qOknZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>> Joe wrote:
>>>>> Michael Johnson <cds@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>> news:XKidnZrwp6Sd5j_anZ2dnUVZ_q-jnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>>> WindsorFox wrote:
>>>>>>> Joe wrote:
>>>>>>>> I know Super Tuesday has yet to arrive, but after the bru-ha-ha
>>> down
>>>>>>>> here, it looks like it'll be McCain and Clinton. What say you?
>>>>>>> If that happens, I won't bother getting out that day. McCain
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> Clinton are interchangeable IMO. Probably wear the same underwear
>>>>> too.
>>>>>>> I'll leave it to everyones imagination which type the two wear.
>>>>>> Do I need to come over to your house and slap some sense into
>>> you?!?!?
>>>>>> Do you really want to hear Hillary's screeching and see Billy
>>>>>> Boy's
>>>>> face
>>>>>> day after day? I would crawl over broken glass ****d to vote
>>> against
>>>>>> her. Billary needs to go away and this is our chance to make it
>>>>> happen
>>>>>> once and for all.
>>>>> Gee, Michael, tell us how you _really_ feel... ;)
>>>> I can't stand the Clintons. They are more responsible for the
>>>> dumbing down of politics in this country than any other two people.
>>>> I don't care about him getting blow jobs in the White House from
>>>> someone other than his wife. Hell, that has happened plenty of
>>>> times in the past. The fact he got caught just shows the depth of
>>>> his stupidity. He took advantage of a young intern that was
>>>> unstable to begin with and that
>>> is
>>>> just ignorant on an inconceivable level. His whole career has been
>>> like
>>>> this. They need to just go away. If the Democrats elect Obama as
>>> their
>>>> candidate it will go a long way in restoring my respect for that
>>>> political party.
>>> Let's face it - both parties are s***. Whatever examples one points
>>> out from either party, there are examples from the other side to
>>> counter. This is but one of the reasons why I'm a registered
>>> Independent.
>> Both sides have their morons for sure. With Clinton's political
>> skills he could have done so much more than he did. His problem is
>> that he is personally weak and can't control himself or his urges.
>> Just look at all the women that have accused him of everything from
>> affairs to rape.
>> The woman that accused him of raping her isn't a floozy. She has a
>> very respectable career and a solid family life. A person can't get
>> that many accusations without there being a basis for them in his
>> personal behavior. The very fact he would take advantage of a young
>> intern in his charge shows just how little control he has over
>> himself.
>>
>> He drug the presidency into the gutter and cheapened the office in a
>> way no one else has done in recent memory. He lied under oath, he
>> lied to everyone of us on camera and he still lies to this day. He
>> still can't control himself and it is killing his wife's chances to
>> become the nominee. Not that I am sad about it.
>>
>> At least Bush has kept his personal life out of the public's business.
>> This is something Clinton could never do. Even while Governor he run
>> a muck and tried to screw anything that and had a pulse. Just look at
>> their tactics in this election. It tells you everything you need to
>> know about their morals and that is they have none. Like I said, they
>> just need to go away.
>
> IMO, Clinton did nothing worse than what tons of other men did and still
> do. His problem was that he got caught and it was splattered all over
> the world. I didn't/don't care who he's screwed, as long as it didn't
> affect me personally, which it really didn't.
Which is why I say he is weak in his personal life. I don't care that
he got a blow job but I do care that he was so reckless about it. Look
at JFK for God's sake. He knew how to cut a piece of strange off and
not get caught. You think Clinton would have known better. Thanks to
his inability to control himself he drug the country through the gutter
for four years over nothing more than a blow job.
I disagree about Clinton's escapades not affecting us personally. While
he was fighting off impeachment Osama was planning to commit mass murder
on 9-11. That set up a series of events that lead us to where we are
today. Had he taken out Osama when he had the chance, and he did have
the chance, life as we know it today would be much different. We had a
taste of what the Islamic extremists wanted to accomplish in the 1993
World Trade Center bombings. They wanted those building to fall then
and Clinton didn't get the extent of the threat they posed and basically
did nothing to fight it aggressively. Had he done so I doubt 9-11 would
have occurred. You can bet that Bush would have taken it seriously had
he been president then.
Say what you want about Bush but he didn't sit around and wait for them
to drop the other shoe on us after 9-11. He went for their jugular vein
and, IMO, is one of the main reasons we haven't had another domestic
attack from them the past seven years. If he was going to err, I want
to to err on the side of going too far rather than not going far enough
and we have 100,000 dead Americans as a result.
> OTOH, Bush's shenannigans have greatly affected me and the rest of the
> country. He's done more damage than anyone in recent memory.
Whether it is damage is yet to be determined, IMO. If Clinton did the
same thing in Iraq the press would be spinning us a whole different
story line. Much of the negatives against Bush are for making political
hay and putting a Democrat in the White House this fall. The biggest
problem that elected Republicans face is that they have forgotten what
makes a conservative a conservative. The people that make up the party
haven't forgotten though and this is why they aren't going to the poles
to vote.
|
