Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


New Ford Mustang
Classic Mustang

Autos - Cars > Ford - Mustang > Re: Intake for ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 7 Topic 15018 of 15154
Post > Topic >>

Re: Intake for a 5.0

by Michael Johnson <cds@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 10, 2008 at 01:21 AM

Jim C wrote:
> I think I have a bad head gasket on an 89 5.0.  I had posted to this
> group a while ago asking for diagnosis tips, and a pep talk on doing
> it myself.  I got lots of good tips, but I guess I'm still chicken.
> I'm probably going to break down and have it done.  While the shop has
> the intake off, what better time to put it back together with a new
> intake? :-)

I think you might want to see what needs to be done to the existing 
heads before buying any new parts.  It isn't very common for a basically 
stock N/A 5.0L to blow a heads gasket.  You should get the heads 
thoroughly checked and if they OK then have them rebuilt.  Depending on 
your budget it may make more sense to buy the new heads and intake than 
spend the money and have nothing but stock heads to show for it.

> I'm looking for recommendations, and I figured this group would have
> plenty of 'em.  This car will be an occasional fun driver, never
> seeing the track, and never stoplight racing, so I'd like to make sure
> to keep daily driveability with no drastic ****fts to the powerband.
> If anything, I'd like to build up that 'invisible push' on your chest
> when you accelerate out of a stop or on a down****ft on the road.  I
> like Edelbrock, because of their affordability and trust in the brand
> name, but I'm open to others.

You are going to be disappointed from just installing an intake (upper 
and lower) while keeping the stock heads.  You might get an additional 
15 horsepower if you are lucky.  It will be barely noticeable from a 
driver's perspective.  IMO, there are other things that can get you more 
horsepower/torque to the rear wheels for the money.  These include: ****t 
matching the stock intake and heads while they are off the car; having 
the heads and intake ****ted to some degree; installing a high flow 2.5" 
exhaust along with 1-5/8" mandrel bent headers; under drive pulleys; 
rear end gears (THE BEST bang-for-the-buck modification you can make); 
subframe connectors (they tighten up the chassis and put more power to 
the rear wheels instead of using it flexing the body of the car); get a 
custom tune using a dyno.

> It seems like their Performer is more for a track car, and last time I
> looked, I remember leaning towards their Performer RPM or Performer
> Jr.
> 
> I already have in-fender cold air, 73mm mass air meter, 70mm throttle
> body, and MSD distributor and rotors.
> 
> Thoughts?

I have wasted more money modifying my '89 LX than I care to admit by not 
making a plan in the beginning and sticking with it.  My advice is to 
determine where you want the car to be at the end of the process and 
then work toward that goal.  IMO, it isn't worth just doing an intake, 
especially if it will just be the upper ****tion.  If you have the stock 
gears then install a set of 3.55s or 3.73s and I guarantee they will 
make a performance difference you can definitely feel.  Also, a high 
flow exhaust from the headers to the tail pipes will make a difference 
over the stock system.  These parts also fit in well when, and if, you 
do more serious modifications like a supercharger or heads/intake/cam. 
I have gone way down the road you are fixing to take and without a good 
solid plan for modifying the car to be what you want at the end of that 
road you will be twisting in the wind and wasting a pile of money in the 
process.  I have a garage full of speed parts to prove it.
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
Intake for a 5.0
Jim C <Jim.Custer@[EMA  2008-04-09 10:54:29 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
"Mary" <dd34  2008-04-09 15:02:17 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
Jim C <Jim.Custer@[EMA  2008-04-09 20:03:21 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-10 17:03:05 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
Michael Johnson <cds@[  2008-04-10 01:21:23 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
"Ironrod" <c  2008-04-29 01:28:33 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
"Riens Udegk" &  2008-05-03 23:59:34 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat Jul 26 23:53:57 CDT 2008.