Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


New Ford Mustang
Classic Mustang

Autos - Cars > Ford - Mustang > Re: Intake for ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 7 Topic 15018 of 15150
Post > Topic >>

Re: Intake for a 5.0

by "Ironrod" <cemuza@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 29, 2008 at 01:28 AM

Save your money, in a Manifold Shootout held some time ago, (in 5.0 Mustang
I think) it was shown that the manifold that gave the engine the most
torque
at the lowest RPM was the one it came with from the factory.  I also
remember another article where the goal was to bolt on 85 HP, after
replacing everything that could possibly be replaced the testers were only
a
little more than half the way to their intended goal.  They did eventually
reach it but that was after extensive machining of all those brand new
parts.  The lesson I took away from that test was that there is about 40
or
more real horsepower still in the stock engine just waiting for you to
massage it out.  In the 20 years I've owned my GT the only time it gets
modified is when the stock parts wear out.  (I'm just about to roll over
for
the third time, so I'm pretty sure my philosophy is valid).


"Jim C" <Jim.Custer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:b5b6a093-6d40-485b-8a2b-c901ee6ad2dd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I think I have a bad head gasket on an 89 5.0.  I had posted to this
> group a while ago asking for diagnosis tips, and a pep talk on doing
> it myself.  I got lots of good tips, but I guess I'm still chicken.
> I'm probably going to break down and have it done.  While the shop has
> the intake off, what better time to put it back together with a new
> intake? :-)
>
> I'm looking for recommendations, and I figured this group would have
> plenty of 'em.  This car will be an occasional fun driver, never
> seeing the track, and never stoplight racing, so I'd like to make sure
> to keep daily driveability with no drastic ****fts to the powerband.
> If anything, I'd like to build up that 'invisible push' on your chest
> when you accelerate out of a stop or on a down****ft on the road.  I
> like Edelbrock, because of their affordability and trust in the brand
> name, but I'm open to others.
>
> It seems like their Performer is more for a track car, and last time I
> looked, I remember leaning towards their Performer RPM or Performer
> Jr.
>
> I already have in-fender cold air, 73mm mass air meter, 70mm throttle
> body, and MSD distributor and rotors.
>
> Thoughts?
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
Intake for a 5.0
Jim C <Jim.Custer@[EMA  2008-04-09 10:54:29 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
"Mary" <dd34  2008-04-09 15:02:17 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
Jim C <Jim.Custer@[EMA  2008-04-09 20:03:21 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-10 17:03:05 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
Michael Johnson <cds@[  2008-04-10 01:21:23 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
"Ironrod" <c  2008-04-29 01:28:33 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
"Riens Udegk" &  2008-05-03 23:59:34 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 22:38:13 CDT 2008.