Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


New Ford Mustang
Classic Mustang

Autos - Cars > Ford - Mustang > Re: Intake for ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 7 Topic 15018 of 15146
Post > Topic >>

Re: Intake for a 5.0

by "Riens Udegk" <spamless@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 3, 2008 at 11:59 PM

yep, the heads has most to gain.
better to put a blower on it.

"Ironrod" <cemuza@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:4RuRj.137233$D_3.105295@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Save your money, in a Manifold Shootout held some time ago, (in 5.0 
> Mustang
> I think) it was shown that the manifold that gave the engine the most 
> torque
> at the lowest RPM was the one it came with from the factory.  I also
> remember another article where the goal was to bolt on 85 HP, after
> replacing everything that could possibly be replaced the testers were
only 
> a
> little more than half the way to their intended goal.  They did
eventually
> reach it but that was after extensive machining of all those brand new
> parts.  The lesson I took away from that test was that there is about 40

> or
> more real horsepower still in the stock engine just waiting for you to
> massage it out.  In the 20 years I've owned my GT the only time it gets
> modified is when the stock parts wear out.  (I'm just about to roll over

> for
> the third time, so I'm pretty sure my philosophy is valid).
>
>
> "Jim C" <Jim.Custer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:b5b6a093-6d40-485b-8a2b-c901ee6ad2dd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> I think I have a bad head gasket on an 89 5.0.  I had posted to this
>> group a while ago asking for diagnosis tips, and a pep talk on doing
>> it myself.  I got lots of good tips, but I guess I'm still chicken.
>> I'm probably going to break down and have it done.  While the shop has
>> the intake off, what better time to put it back together with a new
>> intake? :-)
>>
>> I'm looking for recommendations, and I figured this group would have
>> plenty of 'em.  This car will be an occasional fun driver, never
>> seeing the track, and never stoplight racing, so I'd like to make sure
>> to keep daily driveability with no drastic ****fts to the powerband.
>> If anything, I'd like to build up that 'invisible push' on your chest
>> when you accelerate out of a stop or on a down****ft on the road.  I
>> like Edelbrock, because of their affordability and trust in the brand
>> name, but I'm open to others.
>>
>> It seems like their Performer is more for a track car, and last time I
>> looked, I remember leaning towards their Performer RPM or Performer
>> Jr.
>>
>> I already have in-fender cold air, 73mm mass air meter, 70mm throttle
>> body, and MSD distributor and rotors.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
>
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
Intake for a 5.0
Jim C <Jim.Custer@[EMA  2008-04-09 10:54:29 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
"Mary" <dd34  2008-04-09 15:02:17 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
Jim C <Jim.Custer@[EMA  2008-04-09 20:03:21 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-10 17:03:05 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
Michael Johnson <cds@[  2008-04-10 01:21:23 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
"Ironrod" <c  2008-04-29 01:28:33 
Re: Intake for a 5.0
"Riens Udegk" &  2008-05-03 23:59:34 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 20 4:39:23 CDT 2008.