Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


New Ford Mustang
Classic Mustang

Autos - Cars > Ford - Mustang > Re: Tail light ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 10 of 20 Topic 15064 of 15146
Post > Topic >>

Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight

by "dwight" <dwight@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 11:28 AM

"WindsorFox<SS>" <darkshado666@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fvv0uo$kss$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Joe wrote:
>> "WindsorFox<SS>" <darkshado666@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> news:fvts92$hhc$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> elaich wrote:
>>>> Joe <party@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:Xns9A97A511B4D7nospamforme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> 216.77.188.18:
>>>>
>>>>> Where do you come up with this crap?
>>>> The original louvers were actual metal louvers that covered the
>>>> entire rear lighting from side to side. The ones referred to on ebay
>>>> were molded into the lens assembly, so you do not get the same effect
>>>> as the metal louvers.
>>>     I've never seen a set with metal louvers that screw or stick over 
>>> the plastic lens. Every pair that I've ever seen (and looked at close 
>>> enough to notice) was molded into the plastic lens and then painted
>>> the color of the car in the same way that the lines between the
>>> segments on the LX lenses are painted black. I note this as I hold in
>>> my hands the original OEM lenses off of a 90 GT and from my 89 LX
>>> along with a new OEM replacement set for my LX. The post you quoted is
>>> just more of that troll's petty bull**** that he posts in reply to any
>>> post I make even if he's wrong, like now.
>>>
>>>    I have a representative photo showing said detail if you would like
>>> to see it. If you have a photo of one with separate louvers I'd like
>>> to see it. I'm sure it's possible the early GTs from 87 and 88 could
>>> have been different.
>>>
>>>    Perhaps Dwight will be so kind as to tell us how the lenses are
>>>    made on CFrog...
>>
>> No matter how you cut it, they're not "painted onto the plastic lens"
as 
>> WF erroneously claims (no surprise there).
>
>    Absolutely 10,000% incorrect. This gibberish bull**** could not be
more 
> incorrect if this petty troll tried to be wrong by lying. This troll is 
> purposely combative for no apparent reason and just attempts to
invalidate 
> a reply from me out of petty bull****. I know factually how these are
made 
> as I have a pair of lenses that I personally removed from a 1990 GT in a

> junkyard. They are the OEM Ford lenses and I have a picture that shows
how 
> they are made.
>
>    The cheese grater look is molded into the plastic lens and is painted

> directly onto the plastic the same color as the car. So yes, the
louvered 
> look *is* painted on to the lens. I suggest the OP take that info to the

> bank from the person holding the lenses in his hand rather than a 
> purposely combative troll. I have been told that the GT lenses can be 
> placed on the LX tail light assy in replacement of the LX lenses, but I 
> have never confirmed this myself.
>
>
>
> "I've also noted that a couple of my regular spammers
> have pretty much switched over to phi****ng and 419s
> from pecker pills and sawdust tablets."   -   Bar0
>
> "If it's from BRNIC, it's GOT to be blocked" - Buss Error

I hate to add to a disagreement. CFrog's appear to be some sort of plastic

laminate, perhaps 1/16th or even 1/32nd of an inch thick, glued onto the 
lenses themselves. Without removing them, that's what it looks like to me.

The "louvers" do obviously stand off from the lenses, but they cannot be 
separately removed. Still, they are not painted on (i.e.: flush with the 
surface of the lens). Given the manufacturing standards of 1993, I have to

believe that the overlays (louvers) were painted separately, then glued
atop 
the lenses. There's no way that they could be painted onto the lenses with

such precision.

Of course, Reef Blue being such a SPECIAL color, perhaps mine were 
manufactured differently from the run-of-the-mill colors. (Doubt it.)

Because you asked, I spent the last half hour taking and uploading a
couple 
of shots, which show how the louvers stand off from the lenses:
http://www.tfrog.com/digitals/daily/daily.htm
It's a good thing I'm on vacation with absolutely nothing to do. (Also, 
while you're there, don't miss the beautiful flower shot on the main page 
www.tfrog.com That, actually, is the ONE thing I have to do - pull that
#*%$ 
out.)

Also (a damn shame), it looks like you can find all kinds of LX-style 
taillight assemblies in the aftermarket, but no GT cheese graters (except
in 
Fox's junkyard). LX, Cobra style, or some really crappy Euro style 
taillights, but no GTs.

According to 50Resto, all 1983-1993 taillight assemblies are
interchangable, 
so it looks like you could as easily go from LX to GT as from GT to LX.

dwight
 




 20 Posts in Topic:
Tail light louvers
jonezzzman <byron@[EMA  2008-05-06 22:16:06 
Re: Tail light louvers
Joe <party@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 11:56:55 
Re: Tail light louvers
Jim C <Jim.Custer@[EMA  2008-05-07 10:06:12 
Re: Tail light louvers
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-07 14:38:12 
Re: Tail light louvers
Joe <party@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 20:13:06 
Re: Tail light louvers
elaich <x@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-08 02:09:34 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-07 22:32:36 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
Joe <breakfast@[EMAIL   2008-05-08 11:32:09 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-08 08:58:40 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"dwight" <dw  2008-05-08 11:28:48 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-08 12:09:35 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"dwight" <dw  2008-05-08 14:30:57 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-08 19:31:42 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
Joe <dinner@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-08 22:41:16 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-08 19:35:49 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
Joe <party@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-09 11:22:02 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"Frank ess" <  2008-05-08 09:34:02 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-08 12:14:00 
Re: Tail light louvers
Spike <veeger@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 15:21:04 
Re: Tail light louvers
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-08 19:26:30 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 20 4:31:05 CDT 2008.