Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


New Ford Mustang
Classic Mustang

Autos - Cars > Ford - Mustang > Re: Tail light ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 15 of 20 Topic 15064 of 15150
Post > Topic >>

Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight

by "WindsorFox<SS>" <darkshado666@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 07:35 PM

Joe wrote:
> "WindsorFox<SS>" <darkshado666@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:fvvc4o$lel$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
> 
>> dwight wrote:
>>
>>> I hate to add to a disagreement. CFrog's appear to be some sort of
>>> plastic laminate, perhaps 1/16th or even 1/32nd of an inch thick,
>>> glued onto the lenses themselves. Without removing them, that's what
>>> it looks like to me. The "louvers" do obviously stand off from the
>>> lenses, but they cannot be separately removed. Still, they are not
>>> painted on (i.e.: flush with the surface of the lens). Given the
>>> manufacturing standards of 1993, I have to believe that the overlays
>>> (louvers) were painted separately, then glued atop the lenses.
>>> There's no way that they could be painted onto the lenses with such
>>> precision. 
>>     That looks identical to the ones I have. The reason I say it's 
>> sprayed on is because if you scratch the colored part there is red
>> lens underneath. I don't recommend you do that for proof though, the
>> ones I have already have scratches. The ones I have came off a black
>> car, I thought about swapping them for a while (still may FTHOI) and
>> "Cabernet Red wasn't an option so black was the best choice. See here:
>> http://www.shamikaserver.com/ssforums/showthread.php?p=80620#post80620
>>
>> Looking at mine it still looks molded into the lens and coated because
>> trying to peel it off doesn't seem to work, but I think I could easily
>> scratch it. Might call around and find a smashed one to look at.
>>
>>> Of course, Reef Blue being such a SPECIAL color, perhaps mine were 
>>> manufactured differently from the run-of-the-mill colors. (Doubt it.)
>>     The biggest problem I have is the asshole attitude for petty 
>> purposes, You know what I'm talking about.
> 
> Idiot.  You're the one who keeps ranting on and on.  You were wrong and 
> you still are.  The lenses are not simply painted on as you first 
> claimed.  Now STFU and go away, pest.
> 

     You're a ****in jackass troll. Prove me wrong, I dare you. Look at 
the picture troll boy, go ahead. I was here before you came, and I'll be 
here after you're gone you pathetic doucheweasel.

-- 

"I've also noted that a couple of my regular spammers
have pretty much switched over to phi****ng and 419s
from pecker pills and sawdust tablets."   -   Bar0

"If it's from BRNIC, it's GOT to be blocked" - Buss Error
 




 20 Posts in Topic:
Tail light louvers
jonezzzman <byron@[EMA  2008-05-06 22:16:06 
Re: Tail light louvers
Joe <party@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 11:56:55 
Re: Tail light louvers
Jim C <Jim.Custer@[EMA  2008-05-07 10:06:12 
Re: Tail light louvers
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-07 14:38:12 
Re: Tail light louvers
Joe <party@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 20:13:06 
Re: Tail light louvers
elaich <x@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-08 02:09:34 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-07 22:32:36 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
Joe <breakfast@[EMAIL   2008-05-08 11:32:09 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-08 08:58:40 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"dwight" <dw  2008-05-08 11:28:48 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-08 12:09:35 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"dwight" <dw  2008-05-08 14:30:57 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-08 19:31:42 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
Joe <dinner@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-08 22:41:16 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-08 19:35:49 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
Joe <party@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-09 11:22:02 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"Frank ess" <  2008-05-08 09:34:02 
Re: Tail light louvers PING: Dwight
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-08 12:14:00 
Re: Tail light louvers
Spike <veeger@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 15:21:04 
Re: Tail light louvers
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-08 19:26:30 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 14:03:58 CDT 2008.