

|
 |
| Car and Auto Forums > Honda > Re: Carfax, Buy... |
|
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 4 of 108 Topic 13832 of 14041
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: Carfax, Buying Used, & Craigslist.org
by jim beam <spamvortex@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jun 23, 2008 at 09:22 PM
| Elle wrote:
> "Pszemol" <Pszemol@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>> "Elle" <honda.lioness@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>> I finally got serious about looking for a second Honda
>>> Civic, c. 1989-1997. A few observations:
>> What kind of money are we talking about here?
>> In other words, how much do you want to spend
>> and where are you located? Maybe I will have
>> a car for you.... :-)
>
> Write me where you are located. :-)
>
>>> -- A friend of mine convinced me Carfax was worth $35 for
>>> 30 days, unlimited checks. For the four cars I checked,
>>> it revealed: (a)
>>> Odometer tampering with two, with the advertised mileage
>>> being over 100k lower than the Carfax title re****ted
>>> mileage; (b) lying about the number of owners for a
>>> third; it had had four owners in 18 months. Many re****ts
>>> attest to how Carfax is not perfect, but so far it sure
>>> saved me some trouble.
>> With the car that old I would say actual millage is not
>> as im****tant as the current technical condition of the
>> car.
>
> A 90s Civic engine with 100k-125k miles on to me likely has
> at least 75k miles more left on the engine.
>
> A 90s Civic engine with 200k and up miles on it to me may go
> at any time. If I knew the owner and the maintenance record,
> I might feel a little differently.
>
> There's a huge difference in risk. This is all we can talk
> about here, ya know, probabilities.
i think Pszemol is dead right on this one. there comes a point where
mileage is irrelevant and you're buying the car for the platform, not
any one single component. and with replacement jdm
engines/transmissions being so cheap and plentiful, the condition of the
original is not very im****tant - unlike the quality of the interior
which is pretty much vital.
>
>
>>> -- craigslist.org has been my best resource. (Thanks to
>>> regular poster JT for sending me there!) Ebay,
>>> autotrader.com and dealers have turned up little. Dealers
>>> do not like to deal in cars that do not involve
>>> financing, so low price beaters generally are not
>>> advertised for sale by them. Though oddly, on my Carfax
>>> checks, there's always an advertisement by dealers for a
>>> 199- Civic, complete with VIN. Then I call the dealer,
>>> and the car is not there. Maybe when a car is traded in,
>>> carfax automatically retrieves it and its filter puts the
>>> ad up? But in fact most of these cars are sold at
>>> auction?
>> I am not surprised new car dealers do not keep these cars.
>> The car you are looking for probably is worth much less
>> than
>> a 1000 and takes the same amount of space on the dealer
>> parking
>> lot as tha 20k one.
>
> Kelly blue book puts them at $1200-2500, depending on
> condition, for private party. Retail is usually more.
i've seen up to $3k on craigslist for stock 88-91 civics here in the bay
area. that's if you can find one. the local ricers go nuts for them.
even harder to find now that gas prices are high.
>
> The dealers do not keep them because financing generally is
> not done with such a low cost.
>
>> Also, on average it will look horrible
>> compared to new cars, so new car dealer selling not old
>> used
>> cars does not want to clutter his parking lot with trash
>> like top down rusted 1989 honda civic.
>
> I am sure you are right. :-)
>
>>> -- used car dealers are a hoot! Unless you know what to
>>> look for on these older Hondas, do not buy from a used
>>> dealer. A fine looking Honda Civic DX came up on Craig's
>>> list at a mom n' pop used car dealer****p. I went to see
>>> it. Great body, engine compartment sparkled, fluids
>>> looked clean and topped off; but no muffler; no radio;
>>> check engine light was on; wind****eld was cracked, miles
>>> advertised were 124k and carfax said it was in fact over
>>> 271k miles a year ago. I am considering making a very low
>>> offer (after telling the dealer****p about the flawed
>>> title tampered odometer) just for the shell.
>> What do you consider a "low offer" for such a car?
>> Junkyard is probably paying between 100-200 dolars
>> for a car which can be driven to the yard... Slightly
>> less if it has to be towed. If you see a car on some
>> dealer's parking lot than it means the owner hopes to get
>> much more for his trashy car than he
>> could get from the junkyard.
>
> Well sure. Fortunately Craig's List and Ebay often have
> shells for sale, so I know the asking price for a good shell
> is around $500 to $1000.
>
>>> Further advice?
>> Look at your local junk yard. Sometimes they have
>> cars these old in quite good condition and you might score
>> good find this way...
>> Of course it is junk yard, so the car will not
>> look good, guaranteed.
>
> Indeed there is one local junkyard that buys running cars
> and sells them. I started checking it regularly a few weeks
> ago. Many of the cars there do not look too bad and could be
> fixed up nicely.
>
> I saw such a humdinger a few hours ago. 90 Civic. Lifted the
> hood, and the first thing I always check is the coolant
> reservoir. Well huh, the cap is already unfastened. It's
> overfilled and bubbles are coming out the tube right before
> my very eyes. First blown head gasket yada I have seen. I
> ended the inspection there saying I would not risk it.
buy it, but pay a price that reflects the problem. engines are fixable.
trashed interiors and bent bodies are a giant pita.


|
108 Posts in Topic:
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-23 10:15:16 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-23 16:33:49 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-23 15:28:24 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-23 21:22:07 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-24 14:40:30 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-24 15:47:41 |
|
Larry in AZ <usenet2@[ |
2008-06-25 05:31:30 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-25 05:10:36 |
|
Larry in AZ <usenet2@[ |
2008-06-25 21:24:06 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-25 15:16:01 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-25 23:12:05 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-26 06:55:24 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-26 19:15:37 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-28 13:56:44 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-28 14:18:04 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-28 14:48:47 |
|
Tegger <tegger@[EMAIL |
2008-06-28 21:44:27 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-28 14:51:25 |
|
Tegger <tegger@[EMAIL |
2008-06-28 22:34:18 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-28 15:41:31 |
|
Tegger <tegger@[EMAIL |
2008-06-28 23:21:13 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-25 05:47:07 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-25 15:39:29 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-25 23:14:55 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-25 15:09:02 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-24 18:36:39 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-25 15:07:20 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-25 22:54:07 |
|
"L Alpert" < |
2008-06-26 18:18:36 |
|
Dave Garrett <dave@[EM |
2008-06-27 16:26:44 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-27 14:35:53 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-27 18:37:38 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-27 16:55:17 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-27 19:07:23 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-27 18:32:51 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-27 21:26:27 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-28 07:12:38 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-28 07:25:33 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-28 15:19:13 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-28 13:39:29 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-28 18:19:02 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-28 16:33:22 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-28 14:02:16 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-28 18:16:28 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-28 16:52:42 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-29 07:58:23 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-29 08:58:07 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-29 15:04:27 |
|
Joe <joe@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-06-28 23:25:01 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-06-29 03:13:12 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-29 09:00:54 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-29 15:06:36 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-29 14:15:48 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-13 05:46:03 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-13 20:42:36 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-14 07:17:00 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 10:11:06 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-14 08:28:41 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-14 10:41:21 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 11:51:06 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-14 13:26:41 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 13:56:33 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-14 19:30:38 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-15 09:41:05 |
|
Grumpy AuContraire <Gr |
2008-07-15 23:29:35 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 01:21:03 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-16 07:38:27 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 09:29:35 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-16 10:03:52 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 14:32:01 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-16 20:11:10 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-15 20:52:14 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 01:19:35 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-16 05:48:14 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-16 07:54:01 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-16 05:59:28 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 14:33:39 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-16 22:44:12 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-17 09:10:26 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-17 20:52:09 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-18 08:48:34 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 09:41:05 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 09:35:39 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-16 22:43:38 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 11:27:33 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-14 09:31:18 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 12:35:44 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-14 10:37:29 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 12:55:01 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-14 14:57:02 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 17:05:43 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-14 15:28:26 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 17:42:53 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-14 15:48:04 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 19:16:18 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-14 19:24:46 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-15 09:44:59 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-15 20:51:50 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 01:17:05 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-16 05:47:53 |
|
Grumpy AuContraire <Gr |
2008-07-15 01:20:55 |
|
Tony Harding <ToHard@[ |
2008-07-19 06:04:18 |
|
Joe <joe@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-07-14 12:29:24 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 12:46:21 |
|
Joe <joe@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-07-16 20:48:57 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-16 19:04:42 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-16 21:14:52 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-16 21:06:38 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|