

|
 |
| Car and Auto Forums > Honda > Re: Update Re: ... |
|
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 82 of 108 Topic 13832 of 14041
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: Update Re: Carfax, Buying Used, & Craigslist.org
by "Pszemol" <Pszemol@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jul 16, 2008 at 09:41 AM
| "AZ Nomad" <aznomad.3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:slrng7rrr9.pkl.aznomad.3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:48:14 -0700, jim beam
<spamvortex@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>Pszemol wrote:
>>> "jim beam" <spamvortex@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:rJydnYMmPLzi7eDVnZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> I was never comparing her 93 to todays 2008 models but I was
>>>>> comparing her
>>>>> 93 now with 185k miles to *the same car* when young, with 10k miles
>>>>> in 1993.
>>>>> Do you really think her 93 with 185k burns less fuel than when it
had
>>>>> 10k miles
>>>>> on the odometer? I certainly doubt it.
>>>>
>>>> yes i do - at 10k, the motor is still tight and thus wastes more
>>>> energy on friction.
>>>
>>> Can you point me to some source information on this subject?
>
>>absolutely. http://www.google.com
>
> You expect somebody who was incapable of operating a web browser and
visiting
> google in the first place to be able to use it now?
> You need to give him a search string. Obviously, he can't do it by
himself.
I can see you have joined the elite club...
> Pez: try "engine break-in fuel economy"
Break-in?? You must be kidding me...
We were talking about 10k and 50k comparison, not the first thousand miles
break-in.
Sorry, but I was still unable to find a do***ent comparing mpg of 10k and
50k cars.
Can you be so kind (and wise) and give me the link you've refered to?
I am not as good with google as you, and I was only able to find this
page:
http://autorepair.about.com/cs/generalinfo/a/aa022501a_2.htm
To quote:
"New Engines:
New vehicles have not yet had an op****tunity for the engine to break in
(rings to seat, etc.). A typical engine will take three to five thousand
miles to break in, and during this time period a gradual increase in fuel
economy can be expected." I cannot see there anything about 50k miles car
being better on mileage than a 10k car...
Same here:
http://www.autotrader.com/research/article/car-fuel-economy/27009/many-factors-affect-mpg.jsp?lcat=green&rdpage=ARTPOS1
"Engine Break-in
New vehicles will not obtain their optimal fuel economy until the engine
has broken in. This may take 3-5 thousand miles."
Nothing anywhere about the effects of engine break-in
after the first 10k miles and between 10k-50k period.
Show me how you, my Master, use the google, please!


|
108 Posts in Topic:
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-23 10:15:16 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-23 16:33:49 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-23 15:28:24 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-23 21:22:07 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-24 14:40:30 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-24 15:47:41 |
|
Larry in AZ <usenet2@[ |
2008-06-25 05:31:30 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-25 05:10:36 |
|
Larry in AZ <usenet2@[ |
2008-06-25 21:24:06 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-25 15:16:01 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-25 23:12:05 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-26 06:55:24 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-26 19:15:37 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-28 13:56:44 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-28 14:18:04 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-28 14:48:47 |
|
Tegger <tegger@[EMAIL |
2008-06-28 21:44:27 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-28 14:51:25 |
|
Tegger <tegger@[EMAIL |
2008-06-28 22:34:18 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-28 15:41:31 |
|
Tegger <tegger@[EMAIL |
2008-06-28 23:21:13 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-25 05:47:07 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-25 15:39:29 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-25 23:14:55 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-25 15:09:02 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-24 18:36:39 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-25 15:07:20 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-25 22:54:07 |
|
"L Alpert" < |
2008-06-26 18:18:36 |
|
Dave Garrett <dave@[EM |
2008-06-27 16:26:44 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-27 14:35:53 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-27 18:37:38 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-27 16:55:17 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-27 19:07:23 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-27 18:32:51 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-27 21:26:27 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-28 07:12:38 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-28 07:25:33 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-28 15:19:13 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-28 13:39:29 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-28 18:19:02 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-06-28 16:33:22 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-28 14:02:16 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-28 18:16:28 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-28 16:52:42 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-29 07:58:23 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-29 08:58:07 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-29 15:04:27 |
|
Joe <joe@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-06-28 23:25:01 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-06-29 03:13:12 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-29 09:00:54 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-06-29 15:06:36 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-06-29 14:15:48 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-13 05:46:03 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-13 20:42:36 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-14 07:17:00 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 10:11:06 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-14 08:28:41 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-14 10:41:21 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 11:51:06 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-14 13:26:41 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 13:56:33 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-14 19:30:38 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-15 09:41:05 |
|
Grumpy AuContraire <Gr |
2008-07-15 23:29:35 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 01:21:03 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-16 07:38:27 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 09:29:35 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-16 10:03:52 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 14:32:01 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-16 20:11:10 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-15 20:52:14 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 01:19:35 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-16 05:48:14 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-16 07:54:01 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-16 05:59:28 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 14:33:39 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-16 22:44:12 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-17 09:10:26 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-17 20:52:09 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-18 08:48:34 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 09:41:05 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 09:35:39 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-16 22:43:38 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 11:27:33 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-14 09:31:18 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 12:35:44 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-14 10:37:29 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 12:55:01 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-14 14:57:02 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 17:05:43 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-14 15:28:26 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 17:42:53 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-14 15:48:04 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 19:16:18 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-14 19:24:46 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-15 09:44:59 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-15 20:51:50 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-16 01:17:05 |
|
jim beam <spamvortex@[ |
2008-07-16 05:47:53 |
|
Grumpy AuContraire <Gr |
2008-07-15 01:20:55 |
|
Tony Harding <ToHard@[ |
2008-07-19 06:04:18 |
|
Joe <joe@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-07-14 12:29:24 |
|
"Pszemol" <P |
2008-07-14 12:46:21 |
|
Joe <joe@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-07-16 20:48:57 |
|
"Elle" <hond |
2008-07-16 19:04:42 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-16 21:14:52 |
|
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@[E |
2008-07-16 21:06:38 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|