On Jul 26, 12:42 am, AZ Nomad <aznoma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:12:02 GMT, Talal Itani <tit...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:26:17 GMT, Talal Itani <tit...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
> >>>>The new Accord seems bigger, heavier, fancier, than previous
Accords. I
> >>>>think I am disappointed. Do you agree with me?
>
> >>>That differes from the last 5 generations, how?
>
> >> While this is true, I think it has grown to the point of being obese
> >> and this is what the OP is trying to point out. It is almost in
Avalon
> >> and 300 territory, and surp***** the Explorer and Pilot in length.
>
> >Yes, this is my point. It is as if it is not an Accord anymore.
>
> The same can be said of the last six generations.
> Ever seen what was called an accord in 1981?
> Every generation since has grown heavier and larger.
Well, it isn't just an Accord anymore. The Acura TL is built in the
same factory on the Accord platform. But I like the interior room of
the new Accord. I think the '81 Accord has been functionally replaced
by the Fit.
|
