Gary L. Burnore <gburnore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:ftgkae$pa0$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:07:17 -0700 (PDT), earlio@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>>On Apr 8, 4:06 am, Gary L. Burnore <gburn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:39:06 -0400, K. A. Cannon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <kcan...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 14:59:06 -0700 (PDT), ear...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>
>>> >>On Apr 7, 10:35 am, K. A. Cannon <kcan...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >>> "Earlio" <ear...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> posted
>>> >>> <ftdded$9k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> in
>>> >>> alt.hackers.malicious on Mon, 7 Apr 2008 09:08:43 -0600:
>>>
>>> >>...
>>> >>> >>> I see you in town today, big SUV, black hair streak with
>>> >>> >>> gray, food cooperative recycle shopping bag, anorexic,
>>> >>> >>> sixtyish, black tights, firm gluts, Goth makeup, "What would
>>> >>> >>> Xena do?" bumper sticker, about 5'2". Stimmt?
>>>
>>> >>> >> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!1!!!
>>>
>>> >>> >> Houston, we hace PH04M!
>>>
>>> >>> >>> No, nobody have sense of humour but me, nobody. Error,
>>> >>> >>> Motzarella server no like excessive cross post.
>>>
>>> >>> >> They don't like forging domains either, dumbass.
>>>
>>> >>> >Whatever, they like "123...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" and similars just fine.
>>> >>> > Hmm, newsreader still working despite Burnore lame complaint.
>>> >>> > That was you huh? Should have introduced self, but had fear.
>>>
>>> >>> Oh darn...you got a different news provider:
>>>
>>> >>> X-Complaints-To: Please send complaints to ab...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >>> with full headers
>>>
>>> >>> Bwahahahahahahahaha....
>>>
>>> >>Damn, Teranews and Motzarella accounts both closed out for
>>> >>"abuse", using "forged domains". K. A. Cannon chivato me
>>> >>apuñalastes a mí **** la espalda, ¡ay! ¡ay! ¡ay! Damn! What'd I
>>> >>ever do to you guys? Watch out for K. A. Cannon, he really is one!
>>>
>>> >Any proof to back up your scurrilous accusations?
>>> >No? Thought so.
>>> >I didn't netcop your for your obvious abuse.
>>>
>>> THe domain holders would be the ones to get his access nuked.
>>> --
>>Well sure but a NetKKKop like you would be the one to re****t it, eh?
>>If it walks like a NetKKKop,it looks like a NetKKKop, and it quacks
>>like a NetKKKop, then it must be Gary Burnore.
>
> Did I netKKKop you, tard? Got any proof of your baseless claim?
>
> First you said Kevin did. Now you claim I did. Does this mean you
> were actually spanked? (Hint, your chance to backpedal)
It must have been Sudheer or those dyke users on DataBasix.
|
