On Tue, 06 May 2008 09:13:56 -0600, Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> bill,
> really wondering what your feelings are on this.
> thanks,
>
> Nathan In Montana
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
Good luck.
When Billie /can't/ answer, he ignores.
When he can't fabricate something semi-plausible, he keeps quiet.
If he doesn't like the question posed, he will claim falsehoods.
What he will do though is poast 100 messages di garbaggio to ABPA in anger
and frustration.
Such is life in Billie's tiny world.
But please don't hold your breath waiting for a sensible reply.
>
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:i9qdncKRNcGNpITVnZ2dnUVZ_qOknZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> sir,
>> i know you hate diesel engines in light vehicles for fear of pollution.
>> in addition to purchasing an '01.5 ***mins powered dodge this week (for
>> a work truck), i also purchased a 2008 ***mins powered dodge ram with
>> the 6.7 liter ***mins (
>> http://concealedcarryforum.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=4298
). what i
>> find most interesting about it is that it meets 2010 emmissions
>> standards. not only does it pollute less than gasonline engines, but
>> (read this twice!) the exhaust from this truck is CLEANER than the air
>> that goes into the intake. thats right, the EXHAUST going out the tail
>> pipe is cleaner than the air that goes into the intake thanks to the
>> particulate filter.
>>
>> im wondering, with this being FACT (i can post segments of the
>> dodge/***mins produced video that explains it) how do you now feel
>> about diesels in light vehicles?
>>
>> Nathan In Montana
>> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>>
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."
-- Army Officer's Guide
|
