On Sun, 11 May 2008 15:09:48 -0500, "HEMI - Powered" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>I thought that it would be an appropriately friendly gesture to post
>one of your better babbles, one in which you made a number of threats
>against me, but the very end is the very best. Enjoy, all!
>
>Path: news.easynews.com!en236!core-easynews!news-in-
>02.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!
>border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!
>nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!
>news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:21:23 -0500
>From: "Padraig" <clovers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.automobile
>References: <ua0f431tkvmfcpi532nst5ubk6rjhv9lg2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
><iISdnQT0xeUPBtrbnZ2dnUVZ_vGinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
><odbf43t4vve1f365aj7eelvlbpi8ve1ua5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
><Xns992FD50778C9AReplyScoreID@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
><g7adnZBnHrGEKtrbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
><Xns992FDB88EF8FDReplyScoreID@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
><yfGdnXohnNvDXNrbnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
><Xns992FE3F3F8065ReplyScoreID@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Subject: Re: Dodge Avenger 500
>Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 09:21:25 -0700
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028
>X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
>Message-ID: <kOidnUO8eMqeHNHbnZ2dnUVZ_tGvnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Lines: 110
>X-Trace: sv3-
>lohtWJXYLUqgj1Oa+l2NU1/o2CbRqEh9DHQs/y2RsJlEbzn9AzGGdxzgNiVU1tw8s+IQQzm
>yEXdj1wf!
>lP6/DPQNcPkt44HXWU7FOUhv949GQ5YvthKgxixbzdCKhoCBJ7lZkF4ZqrqaFJNrk1fCSrX
>vDV5W
>X-Complaints-To: abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
>X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
>X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
>complaint properly
>X-Postfilter: 1.3.34
>Xref: core-easynews alt.binaries.pictures.automobile:165811
>
>Well you see Jerry, that's the whole point, isn't it? You keep
>insisting that I want people to think I have insider's knowledge of the
>car industry, while everybody else in these NG's has seen me repeatedly
>deny that. Let me repeat: REPEATEDLY deny that!
>
>Let me repeat one more time (not that it'll do any good): I do not
>have all the auto industry details cached in my head. Nor did I ever.
>Nor do I care. Nor Nor do I want to.
>
>I wouldn't want give anybody the impression that I spent my life in
>that industry. And I've had plenty of engineers working for me over
>the years and I see nothing magical in that profession nor the people
>who occupy it. There are good ones and bad ones and some that are so-
>so, and personalitywise they are all over the spectrum --- sort of like
>YOU for instance. You prove that at least SOME engineers are crazy.
>
>All I am once again (I know you won't remember this) is a car fan. A
>guy who has bought and owned a lot of them over the years. A guy who
>competed in drag racing in a very small way many years ago. A guy who
>has been to lots of auto s****ts events from Lion's Drag Strip in Long
>Beach,California to the Indianapolis 500, and lots of stops in between
>including many visits to the old Riverside Grand Prix before it became
>a housing development, drag races at Bakersfield and the old Orange
>County International Raceway, road races at Laguna Seca, the Budweiser-
>G.I. Joe 200 for Indy cars at ****tland, OR twice, the Long Beach Grand
>Prix twice, and numerous other little events. All I am is a car nut.
>That does not mean I know everything about cars nor the story behind
>all cars. Got it? That's all I've ever claimed to be. Nobody who
>reads these newsgroups will disagree.
>
>All I ever wanted in a.b.p.a. and the other auto groups was to be able
>to go there and read and learn and occasionally contribute some
>pictures of interesting vehicles and maybe have a chuckle or two now
>and then. Most of the names I put on cars were accurate, some weren't.
>BULLETIN: You've made errors yourself. Remember your ridiculous
>referral to a 4-door Mercedes 600CLK last year? Overall I think most
>people have enjoyed my pictures - probably even you - and I certainly
>have enjoyed the give and take with others except yourself. Nothing
>unfair about that. I think that's what these groups are all about, and
>I don't mind it if somebody corrects my occasional mistakes anymore
>that they do when I correct theirs.
>
>But YOU ---- for some imaginary reason ---- you ID'd me as someone
>who'd come on board to challenge your supremacy and you've been
>attacking me for years, I guess maybe because you thought if you could
>discredit me everybody'd think you were more wonderful than you are.
>Only an idiot who had recently been separated from his work environment
>and who was hoping a crummy newsgroup would offer him a way to feel
>im****tant again would interpret my appearance that way and feel the
>need to assasinate my character so that he could maintain or regain his
>"superiority". Ya baffle me man! Don't you understand this is only a
>friggin' newsgroup?
>
>Now that you've acted this way for a long time I surely wouldn't expect
>you to to take it all back and apologize even if you begin to see in
>this explanation that maybe, just maybe, ol' Paddy ain't such a villain
>after all. Maybe he's just a guy who likes cars and can make
>reasonably good pictures and now and then contributes interesting
>content to the group(s).
>
>After all this time no apology would be acceptable from you. You're a
>wacko. A vindictive schmuck and a scandalous liar. I didn't make you
>do or say any of those things. You did them all by yourself. At
>first, when you used to e-mail me I saw your slanderous, libelous
>statements about the personal lives of too many other group members and
>in the past few years you've even been bold enough to put some of your
>idiotic musings right out there on the net for everybody to see. In
>fact recently you've even begun to imagine that it'd be okay to libel
>and slander me personally. You probably figured that as long as it was
>mere insinuation or innuendo rather than outright declarations that I
>couldn't come back on you in a civil suit.
>
>Think again dip****. You may discover otherwise.
>
>How in the hell do you justify any of these things? How do you
>convince yourself that it'll be alright to stalk me into other
>newsgroups like alt.binaries.photos.original or
>alt.binaries.pictures.gardens and attack me there with your unfounded
>and idiotic claims? You make a reference to some sort of relation****p
>that somebody is supposed to have had and you threaten to post snatches
>of some conversation proving it from another newsgroup --- but there's
>just a little problem Jerry --- you know none of those imaginary
>conversations you threaten to cite ever happened! What do you plan to
>do buddy? Make something up?
>
>Do not speak to me on these groups again. Do not make reference to me
>on the internet again. You have repeatedly said that the internet is a
>public forum and once something is written by somebody in the NG's it's
>out there forever, and that's true. And plenty of what you've said is
>out there pal, but NONE of what you insenuate I may have done is. I
>have never said anything on the internet that I am ashamed of. Hell, I
>rarely even make an
>off-color joke.
>
>**** HERE'S THE REALLY JUICY PART ***
>
>You're on thin ice Jerry. Watch your step.
>--
>Paddy's Pig
>
>Posted to a.b.p.a. by a delusional raving lunatic 17May2007.
Message-ID: <hY-dnTlNRKNK25DVnZ2dnUVZ_tjinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I was required to take the officer's test, while in Advanced
Individual Training, which means I have a 59 IQ, and you didn't!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:BillHughes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.billhughes.com/jeep_bookmark.htm
|
