Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Mazda - Miata > Re: CW values f...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 10 of 18 Topic 5194 of 5201
Post > Topic >>

Re: CW values for the NC

by Grant Edwards <grante@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 5, 2008 at 03:23 PM

On 2008-05-05, Invisible Man <Invisible@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2008-05-05, pws <pwshelton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>>>> How about an oval track, only vertical? Shoot down the straight to
build up
>>>> speed, enter a vertical curve at the end which continues until you're
upside
>>>> down and headed back the other direction. Vertical curve at the other
end
>>>> takes you back to the ground on the original straight. That would be
a hoot
>>>> to watch. 
>>> That would be very cool.
>> 
>> Not as cool as a m??bius strip racetrack...
>> 
>
> If someone is going to try it with a F1 car they had better do it quick.

> I believe regs are going to reduce downforce considerably in 2009.
> It would need a strong ceiling. The downforce used at some tracks is
huge.

That's where the moebius strip track has an advantage: once the
field is spread out enough, you'll have cars on both sides of
the strip and the downforces would cancel.  Perhaps the staring
lineup could be split so that half the cars start on one side
and half on the other.

-- 
Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow! I've got an IDEA!!
                                  at               Why don't I STARE at
you
                               visi.com            so HARD, you forget
your
                                                   SOCIAL SECURITY
NUMBER!!




 18 Posts in Topic:
CW values for the NC
Bruno <dont.use@[EMAIL  2008-05-01 19:28:30 
Re: CW values for the NC
"Chris D'Agnolo"  2008-05-03 21:53:19 
Re: CW values for the NC
pws <pwshelton@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 11:02:55 
Re: CW values for the NC
"Chris D'Agnolo"  2008-05-04 16:09:08 
Re: CW values for the NC
pws <pwshelton@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 09:09:03 
Re: CW values for the NC
"miker" <mik  2008-05-05 10:17:54 
Re: CW values for the NC
pws <pwshelton@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 12:04:12 
Re: CW values for the NC
Grant Edwards <grante@  2008-05-05 14:41:11 
Re: CW values for the NC
Invisible Man <Invisib  2008-05-05 20:57:30 
Re: CW values for the NC
Grant Edwards <grante@  2008-05-05 15:23:45 
Re: CW values for the NC
pws <pwshelton@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 00:51:50 
Re: CW values for the NC
Jim Hayter <see.reply.  2008-05-07 12:02:06 
Re: CW values for the NC
Lanny Chambers <lanny@  2008-05-07 11:36:55 
Re: CW values for the NC
XS11E <xs11e@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 10:36:40 
Re: CW values for the NC
Lanny Chambers <lanny@  2008-05-07 17:55:26 
Re: CW values for the NC
"Ken Lyons" <  2008-05-08 00:59:56 
Re: CW values for the NC
Lanny Chambers <lanny@  2008-05-07 23:22:22 
Re: CW values for the NC
Grant Edwards <grante@  2008-05-07 11:18:56 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri May 16 19:51:27 CDT 2008.