Re: Beware of high tech running amok

In article <john-80127C.22411225022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
John A. Weeks III <john@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>In article <LOCdndwGhpv6F17anZ2dnUVZ_sPinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Brent P) wrote:
>
>> >> -- Keyless push-button ignition systems: How about inserting a key
and 
>> >> twisting it?
>>  
>> > I challenge you to find one person in America that would give up
>> > keyless door locks and trade in the clicker for a key.  I bet you
>> > cannot find anyone, at least no one who isn't taking lots of meds.
>> 
>> I've never had keyless entry. I don't really have a desire for it
either. 
>
>Replace the word "keyless" entry with "***", and see how foolish
>that logic sounds when you say it out loud.  Just because you
>haven't tried something doesn't mean that you will not enjoy it
>once you have had it, and thus, you desire it again in the future.

I have keyless entry.  It's called "not locking my door".  Never needs
batteries either.

-- 
  There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices
can
  result in a fully-depreciated one.