Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Miscellaneous Autos > Re: Beware of h...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 61 of 113 Topic 3501 of 3659
Post > Topic >>

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

by N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 27, 2008 at 05:45 AM

On Feb 27, 3:58=A0am, Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> Brent P wrote:
> > In article
<john-80127C.22411225022...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>=
, John A. Weeks III wrote:
> >> In article <LOCdndwGhpv6F17anZ2dnUVZ_sPin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >> =A0tetraethylleadREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Brent P) wrote:
>
> >>>>> -- Keyless push-button ignition systems: How about inserting a key
a=
nd
> >>>>> twisting it?
>
> >>>> I challenge you to find one person in America that would give up
> >>>> keyless door locks and trade in the clicker for a key. =A0I bet you
> >>>> cannot find anyone, at least no one who isn't taking lots of meds.
> >>> I've never had keyless entry. I don't really have a desire for it
eith=
er.
> >> Replace the word "keyless" entry with "***", and see how foolish
> >> that logic sounds when you say it out loud. =A0Just because you
> >> haven't tried something doesn't mean that you will not enjoy it
> >> once you have had it, and thus, you desire it again in the future.
>
> > Why do I want more crap to carry around, another thing to break,
another=

> > thing that needs a battery... For what advantage? Not putting a key
into=

> > a lock? Then I'd never really trust the security of it. If it had a
door=

> > lock as a backup it couldn't be more secure, if it didn't when the
> > battery fails or the remote breaks one would be SOL.
>
> I'm a fan of basic cars... manual windows and all.
>
> But keyless entry rocks.
>
> When it's -40 outside, you can unlock the doors and your two year old
> can climb in while you strap in your infant. =A0My Subaru doesn't have
it,=

> so I have to unlock the front door, open it, and then unlock the back
> door while carrying a kid. =A0pita.
>
> If you have a nice car, you don't ever scratch the paint around the
> locks. =A0Seriously. =A0I don't think I've ever put the keys in the door
> locks on my Trans Am.
>
> Plus, you never have to worry if you locked the doors or not.
>
> I do chuckle, because "hi-tech" for some people might consist of things
> like self starters, radios, automatic transmissions, and disk brakes.
> Anyone here want to go back to point ignitions? :)

Hey!  You talking about me?

nate

(got rid of my last points distributor only a year or so ago; the '55
is running a Chrysler "orange box" ignition now, although I do have a
MSD 6AL that I might try to adapt...)
 




 113 Posts in Topic:
Beware of high tech running amok
"Ed White" <  2008-02-25 16:59:45 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Arif Khokar <akhokar12  2008-02-25 22:48:20 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Shawn Hirn <srhi@[EMAI  2008-02-26 05:53:34 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
z <gzuckier@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-27 11:16:51 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
necromancer <55_sux@[E  2008-02-25 18:10:24 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John A. Weeks III&q  2008-02-25 18:59:01 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-25 21:41:27 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John A. Weeks III&q  2008-02-25 22:41:12 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-25 22:48:19 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-25 21:21:34 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-26 13:03:43 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John A. Weeks III&q  2008-02-26 02:13:11 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-26 13:09:24 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-25 23:02:28 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John A. Weeks III&q  2008-02-26 02:14:55 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-26 07:14:18 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-26 06:40:16 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-26 09:36:03 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-26 17:52:29 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-26 23:48:51 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"C. E. White" &  2008-02-27 07:10:23 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 07:00:31 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-27 06:30:01 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 09:03:59 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"C. E. White" &  2008-02-27 10:05:01 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-02-27 15:08:21 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-27 06:27:13 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 09:02:26 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-27 21:01:45 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 23:10:15 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-27 22:00:45 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-28 15:55:19 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-28 14:52:05 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-28 17:01:06 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-28 11:47:49 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-28 11:54:51 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-28 15:05:40 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
gpsman <gpsman@[EMAIL   2008-02-28 05:46:13 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-02-27 08:58:23 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-27 06:44:35 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 09:06:54 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 19:29:56 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 21:46:39 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 19:40:02 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 21:54:22 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-28 05:21:37 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Krhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-27 18:22:12 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 12:41:50 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 18:12:41 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 21:31:41 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-28 17:11:32 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 18:14:27 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 21:04:04 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
gpsman <gpsman@[EMAIL   2008-02-28 00:11:29 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-25 20:53:36 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Krhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-27 18:39:50 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
MLOM <grvan@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-25 21:23:40 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Harry K <turnkey4099@[  2008-02-26 08:37:28 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Harry K <turnkey4099@[  2008-02-26 08:52:12 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-26 11:58:58 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-27 05:45:38 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-02-27 15:11:01 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-27 05:47:51 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-27 07:45:04 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-02-28 08:11:32 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-28 06:17:51 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
ray <rollingviolation@  2008-02-28 15:04:09 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Roger Blake <rogblake1  2008-02-29 04:41:28 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-27 07:48:41 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-02-28 08:15:47 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-27 11:44:24 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-27 11:51:20 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 15:23:21 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 15:26:34 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 18:05:26 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"Ed White" <  2008-02-27 22:20:35 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 21:50:01 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-28 16:01:20 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-28 18:19:26 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-29 19:55:22 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 16:11:36 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 18:28:15 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-28 16:54:33 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-28 19:00:44 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 17:01:27 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 19:33:40 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-28 17:11:40 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-27 17:22:21 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 21:04:34 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-29 06:14:15 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"HLS" <nospa  2008-02-26 01:02:39 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Shawn Hirn <srhi@[EMAI  2008-02-26 05:50:56 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"benteaches@[EMAIL P  2008-02-26 09:24:05 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"*" <nospam@  2008-02-27 09:47:21 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"C. E. White" &  2008-02-27 12:55:25 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-27 14:56:18 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
z <gzuckier@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-27 11:14:47 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John S." <h  2008-02-27 13:20:49 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"Ed White" <  2008-02-27 17:46:06 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John S." <h  2008-02-27 15:34:38 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"Ed White" <  2008-02-27 22:38:28 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-28 07:46:51 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"C. E. White" &  2008-03-03 17:19:14 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-04 12:22:35 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John S." <h  2008-02-28 16:22:44 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John S." <h  2008-03-01 13:23:55 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"C. E. White" &  2008-03-03 17:38:19 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"benteaches@[EMAIL P  2008-02-28 09:27:37 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John S." <h  2008-02-28 16:26:15 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-28 20:41:42 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
disston <cgwix@[EMAIL   2008-02-29 08:17:07 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-29 10:15:23 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-29 20:19:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Wed Jul 9 2:13:34 CDT 2008.