Autos - Cars > Miscellaneous Autos > Re: Beware of h...

Latest [ Topics | Posts ]

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

by tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brent P) Feb 27, 2008 at 11:10 PM

In article <3tfcs310k8slhv5b06jpmn33m3pieoagfl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Scott in SoCal
wrote:

> Respect is fine, but the burden of proof for your statements is still
> on your shoulders. I wouldn't have asked except all my Google searches
> for "PATS hacked" "PATS cracked" and similar turned up nothing, so I
> was hoping you could remember where you saw this information.

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.08/carkey.html

BTW.... the other thing you accused me of making up: 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/24179772@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
 yeah, I gotta va***e in there.

113 Posts in Topic:

Beware of high tech running amok

"Ed White" <

2008-02-25 16:59:45

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Arif Khokar <akhokar12

2008-02-25 22:48:20

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Shawn Hirn <srhi@[EMAI

2008-02-26 05:53:34

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

z <gzuckier@[EMAIL PRO

2008-02-27 11:16:51

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

necromancer <55_sux@[E

2008-02-25 18:10:24

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"John A. Weeks III&q

2008-02-25 18:59:01

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-25 21:41:27

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"John A. Weeks III&q

2008-02-25 22:41:12

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-02-25 22:48:19

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Scott in SoCal <scotte

2008-02-25 21:21:34

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-02-26 13:03:43

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"John A. Weeks III&q

2008-02-26 02:13:11

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-02-26 13:09:24

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-25 23:02:28

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"John A. Weeks III&q

2008-02-26 02:14:55

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-26 07:14:18

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Scott in SoCal <scotte

2008-02-26 06:40:16

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-26 09:36:03

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Scott in SoCal <scotte

2008-02-26 17:52:29

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-26 23:48:51

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"C. E. White" &

2008-02-27 07:10:23

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 07:00:31

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Scott in SoCal <scotte

2008-02-27 06:30:01

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 09:03:59

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"C. E. White" &

2008-02-27 10:05:01

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC

2008-02-27 15:08:21

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Scott in SoCal <scotte

2008-02-27 06:27:13

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 09:02:26

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Scott in SoCal <scotte

2008-02-27 21:01:45

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 23:10:15

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Scott in SoCal <scotte

2008-02-27 22:00:45

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-28 15:55:19

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-28 14:52:05

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-28 17:01:06

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-28 11:47:49

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-28 11:54:51

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-28 15:05:40

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

gpsman <gpsman@[EMAIL

2008-02-28 05:46:13

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC

2008-02-27 08:58:23

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Scott in SoCal <scotte

2008-02-27 06:44:35

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 09:06:54

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-27 19:29:56

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 21:46:39

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-27 19:40:02

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 21:54:22

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR

2008-02-28 05:21:37

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Krhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-27 18:22:12

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 12:41:50

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-27 18:12:41

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 21:31:41

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-02-28 17:11:32

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-27 18:14:27

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 21:04:04

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

gpsman <gpsman@[EMAIL

2008-02-28 00:11:29

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR

2008-02-25 20:53:36

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Krhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-27 18:39:50

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

MLOM <grvan@[EMAIL PRO

2008-02-25 21:23:40

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Harry K <turnkey4099@[

2008-02-26 08:37:28

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Harry K <turnkey4099@[

2008-02-26 08:52:12

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR

2008-02-26 11:58:58

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR

2008-02-27 05:45:38

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC

2008-02-27 15:11:01

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR

2008-02-27 05:47:51

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR

2008-02-27 07:45:04

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC

2008-02-28 08:11:32

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Scott in SoCal <scotte

2008-02-28 06:17:51

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

ray <rollingviolation@

2008-02-28 15:04:09

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Roger Blake <rogblake1

2008-02-29 04:41:28

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR

2008-02-27 07:48:41

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC

2008-02-28 08:15:47

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR

2008-02-27 11:44:24

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR

2008-02-27 11:51:20

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-27 15:23:21

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-27 15:26:34

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 18:05:26

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"Ed White" <

2008-02-27 22:20:35

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 21:50:01

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-28 16:01:20

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-28 18:19:26

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-02-29 19:55:22

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-27 16:11:36

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 18:28:15

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-28 16:54:33

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-28 19:00:44

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-27 17:01:27

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 19:33:40

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis

2008-02-28 17:11:40

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR

2008-02-27 17:22:21

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@

2008-02-27 21:04:34

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR

2008-02-29 06:14:15

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"HLS" <nospa

2008-02-26 01:02:39

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Shawn Hirn <srhi@[EMAI

2008-02-26 05:50:56

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"benteaches@[EMAIL P

2008-02-26 09:24:05

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"*" <nospam@

2008-02-27 09:47:21

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"C. E. White" &

2008-02-27 12:55:25

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-02-27 14:56:18

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

z <gzuckier@[EMAIL PRO

2008-02-27 11:14:47

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"John S." <h

2008-02-27 13:20:49

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"Ed White" <

2008-02-27 17:46:06

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"John S." <h

2008-02-27 15:34:38

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"Ed White" <

2008-02-27 22:38:28

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR

2008-02-28 07:46:51

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"C. E. White" &

2008-03-03 17:19:14

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-03-04 12:22:35

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"John S." <h

2008-02-28 16:22:44

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"John S." <h

2008-03-01 13:23:55

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"C. E. White" &

2008-03-03 17:38:19

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"benteaches@[EMAIL P

2008-02-28 09:27:37

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

"John S." <h

2008-02-28 16:26:15

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

Scott in SoCal <scotte

2008-02-28 20:41:42

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

disston <cgwix@[EMAIL

2008-02-29 08:17:07

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR

2008-02-29 10:15:23

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED

2008-02-29 20:19:51

Post A Reply:

About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
tan13V112 Sun Jul 27 0:23:40 CDT 2008.