"David M" <NOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:464517da$0$3236$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 11 May 2007 06:31:41 -0700, flrealbot rearranged some electrons
to
> form:
>
>> lame website stuff snipped
>
> Your web site is not only lame, but has incorrect information on it.
>
> 351C and 351W are completely different engines.
>
I haven't been to the website, but everybody knows that the 351 Cleveland
and the 351 Windsor are as different as night and day. They are completely
different. That's C-O-M-P-L-E-T-E-L-Y.
Wow, I can't believe somebody put together a site (or even a measely page)
that says these two engines share anything beyond displacement.
I forget which is which, but I recall that one is loosely based on the
289 -- its a small block motor -- and the other is based on the 429 --
which
is a large block (I think the Cleveland is the small block and the Windsor
is the large block). Obviously one would have to have a longer stroke as
compared to the other, causing the long stroke motor to run at lower RPMs.
The long stroke will produce more torque at the low end, but will top out
much sooner.
I gotta take a look at the website now ...
|
