And here I thought Ford made more Jeeps than Willys, during the war, and
again the independent wheel thing for the Army during the sixties.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:LWHughes3rd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.billhughes.com/
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:3fCdnZ4nVr2JltrbnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ford engines of any displacement were *never* used from the factory in
Jeep
> Wagoneers. Originally they used Willys "Tornado" sixes and in 1966 used
> AMC's 232 sixes. The Super Wagoneers used Buick V8's and from 1971-on
all
> Wagoneers used AMC engines.
>
> > <copied from www.ford351.com>
> >
> > Ford 351 - Ford 351C - Ford 351W
> >
> >
> > Also known as "351 Cleveland", and "351 Windsor".
> >
> >
> > Ford 351
> >
> > Produced by Ford Motor Company from 1969 through 1997, the Ford 351
cubic
> > inch engine, also known as the "Ford 351W" or "Ford 351C" was a
favorite
> > V8 engine of the GM line. Appearing in such models as the Ford
Mustang,
> > Ford full size cars and trucks, Jeep-brand Wagoneer, and Ski Nautique
ski
> > boats, the Ford 351 also was the engine of choice for the mid-engine
> > Pantera s****ts car in the 1970s.
> >
> > Introduced in 1969, the 351 c.i. "Windsor" (351W) was rated between
250
> > and 290 stock horsepower with a 3.5 inch stroke in a 335 small block.
In
> > 1970, the 351 "Cleveland" (351C) was introduced primarily for the Ford
> > Mustang. The majority of 351 Cleveland engines are 2 barrel carburetor
> > versions with low compression, although the rare "Boss 351C", produced
> > only in 1971, was rated at 330 base horsepower. At the end of the 1974
> > model year, Ford ceased production of the 351C "Cleveland" design at
the
> > Cleveland, Ohio plant. Production of the immensely popular 351W
"Windsor"
> > continued until 1997 when the Windsor, Ontario plant was closed.
> >
> > <end copy and paste>
> >
> > These motors are not, and never have been, known as "or." They are
> > completely different designs, differing in many ways, most notably the
> > physical size differences. Except for the displacement -- 351 cubic
> > inches -- there is nothing similar about them. They are not
interchangable
> > in most applications, however I'd be teh first to admit that with
enough
> > fabrication skills one could interchange anything.
> >
> > I was not aware the the Ford 351C was a favorite of the GM line. Could
you
> > provide any citation where GM used Ford power plants?
> >
> > Good luck with your Website.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <flrealbot@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:1178890301.824594.68080@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Repost:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am working on a new website www.Ford351.com and need pictures of
> >> Ford 351 engines. I had a '72 Ford Torino with a 351C engine but no
> >> good engine pictures before restoration.
> >>
> >> Specifically, I am looking for 351 C or 351 W engines. Pictures of
a
> >> "Boss 351" or 351 engines factory installed in non-Ford cars
(Pantera,
> >> Ski Nautique, Jeep) will be interesting.
> >>
> >> Please help me find Ford 351 engine pictures. They must be your
> >> pictures; please do not mail me links or search suggestions. No
> >> pictures of your cars, boats or trucks.
> >>
> >> Images to pics@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
