Hidden Al-Qaeda messages - delete all MI5 Persecution links or better yet -
corrupt the messages and send them out!
MI5Victim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> Balham Hill Post Office (14/Nov/2002)
>
> Certainty level: 80%
>
> By mid-November 2002 the persecution had again dwindled, as happens
> sometimes, when along came this item. I spent most of my time at home,
> going occasionally to the shops in Clapham South, or into town to meet
> people. On this particular Thursday I only left the house once, for less
> than fifteen minutes to post a letter (special delivery, because my
> ordinary and recorded delivery letters had been disappearing en route
for
> some time - not that anyone would accuse MI5 of such petty harassment).
At
> the post office counter there was an Asian guy talking into his mobile
> phone and grinning away. There is a probability that his comments were
> directed at me, as I will explain further. The second segment of audio
> closely follows the first segment.
>
> "you'll do it today? let's meet about 3 o'clock and have some lunch. I
got
> stuff to do and I'll go to the bank, get this sh.. fucking moving yeah.
> Even just a little bit do something. He doesn't understand, you know
what
> it is, I don't want to tell him again cause then he might, he thinks
we're
> having a go at him, I'm not having a go at him, I'm explain to him"
>
> Explanation: The guy is talking about some bloke who is unnamed, however
> it might be interpreted as being in code about me. "I'll go to the
> bank"... variously interpretable, either literally, or as sounds-like
> "wank" which has been a consistent theme in MI5's abuse. "get this shit
> fucking moving"... abuse... could be interpreted as MI5's criticism of
my
> inertness. The state spends hundreds of thousands of pounds a year -
they
> want to see some result, not just neutrality and ordinariness. "he
doesn't
> understand"... MI5 claim I'm stupid... but the numbers and bits of paper
> prove otherwise, so perhaps what that is really about is their agents'
> subconscious perception of themselves.
>
> "having a go at him"... sounds like they're having a go at me, doesn't
it?
> You might take the audio at face value and assume it's about some other
> guy, but it's normal MI5 procedure to pretend to be talking about
someone
> else, and make the content of the message very relevant to me, or their
> perception of me.
>
> "for some reason it doesn't get into his head, I don't know why... he's
> lost it completely, hasn't he"
>
> What reason is there for it not getting into his (my) head? Stupidity is
> implied. Also implied is that it does get into his head; we're
> intentionally causing him damage. He's lost it completely... for some
time
> I have suffered from OCD... lost it completely is the persecutors'
> observation of my illness, which they see through the surveillance on my
> home, which they caused.
>
> 25658
>
>
> --
> Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
> ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
> Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
--
spacecowboy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
