Tony always had control of Indy. You are eager to
dismiss everything CART/OWRS/CCWS/ChampCar, yet you
ultimately find it strong enough to be damaging the a IRL.
If we take as a given that ChampCar does not have a wide
fan base, and certainly not the Indy 500, it would seem
that the IRL's successes or lack thereof have little or
nothing to do with ChampCar.
And as always, we slow learners are eager to "learn" what
is better about the Indy 500 since the inception of the IRL.
Is it the one engine format? Smaller overall entry list that
makes things like "Bump Day" minimally interesting or
non-existant?
About the newsworthy IRL news we hear about is Danica
Patrick, or a dance champion on ABC. And I remind my
slow-learner brothers in the IRL camp, I am not comparing
your series to Champ Car. I'm comparing it to open
wheel racing BEFORE the IRL.
Take as much time on the questions as you need, as we
are not measuring your comprehension or analytical skills.
We are also allowing for "." (dot's) inevitable lack of
an answer, but plethora of little used vernacular and
colloquial rhetorc pulled from a Thesaurus next to
his computer.
-Sterling
On Jan 20, 11:50=A0am, Ken Plotkin <kplot...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:40:00 -0800 (PST), sterlingla
>
> <sterlin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >As to the statement here about Tony "I don't know" George, the first
> >part of the sentence seems reasonable,
> >but it what is it that Tony "won?"
>
> Control of open wheel racing. =A0Unfortunately, he did not count on the
> damage that would be done by the slow learners clinging to
> CART/OWRS/CCWS/ChampCar.
>
> Ken Plotkin
|
