On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 16:05:35 -0600, "." <.@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>"6andretti" <dequardo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:dq3us3h8be9fjj7h8mcmihk9rl5ag6bmbs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:12:12 -0600, "." <.@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >"6andretti" <dequardo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >news:5k3ts35tihleu4e3670b896ti9qq6bh8tg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 09:17:56 -0600, "." <.@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >"Lenny" <haysooce@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >>
>>news:6a8f517e-e951-472d-bffe-0508d79dbf23@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> On Mar 4, 8:25 am, forty <cforteR3M...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> > just bob wrote:
>> >> >> > >http://www.autos****t.com/news/re****t.php/id/65415
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > > Finally someone agrees.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I don't think he's the only one who agrees. He just has
immunity
>> >thanks
>> >> >> > to being in another series.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I think we all agree, even those without immunity, but I hope
some
>of
>> >> >> the stronger teams will prevail...in particular, Justin and NHL
>should
>> >> >> do well.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Having said this, I place my bets on Penske. Except for Kanaan,
AGR
>> >> >> has a low talent base this year and will sink like a rock. I
can't
>> >> >> think of another team that can do well from either series.
>> >> >
>> >> >Every year the same sort of hopeful predictions from
>> >> >the same envious, ugly mindset (the IRL won't turn a
>> >> >wheel, they'll fold, the 500 will die, it won't field 33
>> >> >cars, AGR only did well because of TGs financing, or
>> >> >the Honda engine, or Honda's sup****t ... ad infinitum
>> >> >ad nauseam) and EVERY YEAR, WITHOUT FAIL,
>> >> >the miscreant exceedingly slow learners are, without
>> >> >the slightest doubt, proven wrong yet again. Were it
>> >> >not (for them) so tragically pathetic, such farce would
>> >> >be incredibly entertaining and absolutely hilarious!
>> >> >
>> >> non sequitur
>> >
>> >No, it's simply (as always) farther over your head than
>> >is the exosphere.
>> >
>> Again only one large (relative) word. Distinct progress.
>
>When the facts are against you, as they always are,
>pretend to argue the logic. When the logic is against
>you, as it always is, pretend to argue the facts. When
>they're both so clearly and indisputably against you,
>argue that your defense is your: childlike, extremely
>limited vocabulary (which you proudly exhibit as
>though it were a badge of honor); inability to parse
>the English language; challenged reading comprehension;
>actual disrespect for and aversion to valid facts, figures,
>sup****ting evidence and do***entation; each and all of
>which are the fault and responsibility of your adversary.
>
I looked up the phase 'delusions of grandert' and saw your picture.
Not flattering I must admit.
|
