Re: Welcome to the Big Time, Bourdais

On Mar 18, 2:06 pm, "." <....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Mike P" <priv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:64a457F2atirmU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > "." <....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:5APDj.32258$yk5.14864@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > > "Mike P" <priv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > >news:649d76F2a86dlU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> <big snip to make this more readable
>
> > >> >> > I suspect you will counter that by saying that Seabass never
beat
> > >> >> > anyone
> > >> >> > good in Champcar... which is just the same as AGR in the IRL
>
> > >> >> > Mike P
>
> > >> > Wow, what a truly pathetic attempt at a rebuttal, and it
> > >> > only took two attempts and at least an hour and forty
> > >> > six minutes at that. Btw, I don't remember Wendlinger
> > >> > being all that fat or whining (the one thing that chumps
> > >> > truly are champions at).
>
> > >> Unlike you Mr Dot, I have a life outside usenet, hence it took me
so
> long
> > > to
> > >> reply.
>
> > > That's of course total crap and meant as a dodge, you're
> > > an exceptionally egregious and failed bull**** artist. The
> > > "big snip" was of course a pathetic attempt to conceal
> > > that glaringly conspicuous fact, which of course also
> > > miserably failed.
> >
>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.s****t.cart/msg/c716dcd1694d8211
> >
>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.s****t.cart/msg/fc65106c44eb3e93
> > > You know goddamned good and well that you had
> > > already responded to that post and that it took you
> > > nearly two hours to conceive and compose even
> > > more of your inimitable (then again, who'd want to
> > > copy it) brand of deception in another reply.about
> > > it. Just who in the hell do you think you're kidding?
>
> > Oddly, I have no idea what the **** you are on about.
>
> I don't find it at all odd that someone who doesn't know what
> the **** he's talking about has a reading comprehension problem.
>
>
>
> >23:04 UK time, I
> >went
> > to bed shortly after. With my wife. You know, a woman!! Have you seen
> > one?ever? 8:35am UK time, I'm having breakfast, and just decided to
see
> what
> > ****e you had come up with. The usual repetetive toss by the looks of
> > things.
>
> > As far as I can see, the snip was to make it easier to read. My
newsreader
> > keeps things in threads, I just got sick of reading down it.
>
> Really?! That unable to read and accurately interpret the
> spoonfed google links I provided are you?
>
> The earlier:
> Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:05:19
-0600http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.s****t.cart/msg/32b5cdeda0f74b97
>
> Your reply:
> Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:18:04
-0000http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.s****t.cart/msg/c716dcd1694d8211
>
> Your next reply nearly two hours later to the very same
> post with absolutely nothing whatsoever newly appended,
> prepended or in any manner edited by me or anyone else
> in the interim:
> Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:04:52
-0000http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.s****t.cart/msg/fc65106c44eb3e93
>
> > If you are so
> > sad as to still use google groups, that's not my problem.
>
> If you could successfully read and interpret headers, you'd
> realize that I don't use google groups either for reading or
> replying to posts. Now see if you can go and figure out
> that which wouldn't begin to flummox a retarded 10 year
> old in a hurry.
>
> There, is that now sufficient spoonfeeding or will baby
> bull**** artist require even more (that he won't receive)?
>
> Again, just who in the hell is it that you think you're kidding?

I can piss farther than you can!!! woo hoo!