"." <.@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:fZtGj.48567$yk5.32644@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Powell's Colon" <powellscolon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
news:3fdd74b4-4739-443b-a763-a2d5c8924922@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mar 24, 7:03 pm, "Powell's Colon" <powellsco...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Mar 24, 4:40 pm, "." <....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> > "Mike P" <priv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> > > I would have liked to see Andretti do well. He didn't, he was
pretty
>> > > lacklustre all season really. I was happy when Villeneuve did well
in
> F1, I
>> > > always wanted Montoya to do well too. It's not an anti-American/AOW
> thing,
>> > > it's just a "**** overrated driver" thing.
>>
>> > > Mike P
>>
>> > Kindly spare us all your hypocritically selective,
>> > sanctimonious pretensions, petty jealousies and
>> > brain numbingly pedestrian analyses.
>>
>
> Although this has been explained more than once, you seem incapable of
> understanding the meaning. Or, is it just your immature and
> unintelligent cut-n-paste naiveté on display? What analyses? No
> analysis was required, as he posted his personal feelings that don't
> reflect anything remotely related to petty jealousies or sanctimonious
> pretensions and clearly don't contain one item requiring analysis. In
> response to his opinion, you post a non sequitur with all this bilious
> drivel, and somehow wrongly state that you (although you assume to
> speak for 'us') don't require his (multiple) analysis. That
> Andretti's season was lackluster is sup****ted by a very real fact.
> Michael Andretti was dismissed from his driver position prior to the
> season's conclusion. No analysis required, just his opinion based on
> a factual reality. The follow on, "**** overrated driver" is clearly
> a personal opinion, yes? What analyses? Do you get it yet, you
> complete imbecile?
>
> Wadda maroon. Wadda nin-cow-poop.
>
> (((((())))))))
>
>
> Don cha just luv the delusionally hopeless pretense
> that my most recent, and final, reply was our first
> ever correspondence? But all that aside, do I totally
> own this particular above attention seeking, incessant
> nym ****fting miscreant or what? He's probably still
> fuming just because I normally won't and don't
> any longer respond to his tantrum driven, puerile
> spewings either.
>
This newsgroup owns YOU dotty boy. You are just SO easy to get the
required
response from. The funniest thing is, you don't even realise it!
Have a nice day y'all
Mike P
|
