"RickyBobby" <nascar42@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:34AGj.12229$6J3.11597@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "armpit" <armarmpitpit@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:bs2dnSiBE8GLCHfanZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "F®" <fr2112@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:424lu35m2jvpr1frlfvkd275mmc9vpkp5e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sometime on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:00:33 -0400, "armpit"
>>> <armarmpitpit@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> types:
>>>
>>>>Apparently you have no rebuttal for any of RB's points, since you
>>>>immediately attacked his posting ID, followed by an anti-Nascar rant,
>>>>and
>>>>never directly addressed *any* of his points.
>>>>
>>>>Nice post. Really.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, nice post.
>>>
>>> RB has been the resident xenophobe in the racing groups since I`ve
>>> been reading them. It`s always good for a few ****s and giggles when
>>> someone new calls him out on his trolling ways.
>>
>>
>> To each their own, I guess. If RB is a troll, and everyone knows it,
why
>> the hell does anyone respond?
>>
>> Troll = attention whore
>>
>
> Do not be calling me a troll! You may not agree with everything I say
but
> you cannot deny me the right to be wrong.
I said "if"
The post I responded to accused you of trolling. My point was that if
people
think you are trolling, why respond?
|
