"armpit" <armarmpitpit@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:2Z-dndjM2btD63banZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "RickyBobby" <nascar42@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:34AGj.12229$6J3.11597@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "armpit" <armarmpitpit@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:bs2dnSiBE8GLCHfanZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> "F®" <fr2112@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:424lu35m2jvpr1frlfvkd275mmc9vpkp5e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sometime on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:00:33 -0400, "armpit"
>>>> <armarmpitpit@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> types:
>>>>
>>>>>Apparently you have no rebuttal for any of RB's points, since you
>>>>>immediately attacked his posting ID, followed by an anti-Nascar rant,
>>>>>and
>>>>>never directly addressed *any* of his points.
>>>>>
>>>>>Nice post. Really.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, nice post.
>>>>
>>>> RB has been the resident xenophobe in the racing groups since I`ve
>>>> been reading them. It`s always good for a few ****s and giggles when
>>>> someone new calls him out on his trolling ways.
>>>
>>>
>>> To each their own, I guess. If RB is a troll, and everyone knows it,
why
>>> the hell does anyone respond?
>>>
>>> Troll = attention whore
>>>
>>
>> Do not be calling me a troll! You may not agree with everything I say
>> but you cannot deny me the right to be wrong.
>
> I said "if"
>
> The post I responded to accused you of trolling. My point was that if
> people think you are trolling, why respond?
>
Because if people did not respond there would be no Usenet.
|
