Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Auto Tech > Re: regenerativ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 20 Topic 20817 of 22268
Post > Topic >>

Re: regenerative braking

by Evgenij Barsukov <evgenij_b_no_spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 4, 2008 at 09:23 AM

John Bailey wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 11:52:51 GMT, "Androcles"
> <Headmaster@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> "RichD" <r_delaney2001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>
news:fc536e3e-6d54-45fc-a36a-31c432e32c58@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> | What is the efficiency of regenerative brakes?
>> |
>> |
>> | Let's say we have a 3000 lb. vehicle, traveling 30 mph.
>> | It hits a red lght.  That's 1350000 lb-(mi/hr)^2
>> | kinetic energy, dissipated through the disc brakes.
>> |
>> | Now assume it's a Prius - how much is recovered
>> | into the batteries?
>> |
>> | I'm not looking for a theoretical discussion, just a
>> | number.  Anybody know the number?
>> |
>>
>> 80%.  Friction with air still causes some braking but most
>> of the KE is recovered and stored as useful energy to get
>> going again. Remember that no energy is required to continue
>> in a vacuum, so all the energy a car uses is wasted as heat
>> directly through the exhaust pipe and radiator and the rest
>> warms the atmosphere through friction.
>>
> Is that a fact and reason based answer or just a guess?  A battery is
> not as efficient as a capacitor and there is a theorem from sophomore
> EE that "proves" no more than 1/2 the energy stored in a capacitor can
> be recovered.  

Battery is storing energy chemically at almost constant voltage,
therefore proof you are talking about does not apply. In fact
a traditional 18650 Li-ion battery at low current rate (say C/10 rate) 
can be charged/discharged at 98% energy efficiency.
Main energy loss is due to IR drop both during charge and discharge, 
which declines with I^2.  E_loss = I^2*R

Unfortunately during regenerative breaking currents are very high
so batteries have to be designed with very low R (that is why
only Panasonic and Sanyo can make suitable for HEV NiMH batteries).
     But even using the latest version of Panasonic NiMH batteries with
further reduced R, 80% efficiency of both energy recovery + subsequent 
reuse (which both have losses) appears very optimistic. I would bet on 
60%, but I would also appreciate somebody posting the real number.

Regards,
Evgenij



More personal research would be needed to recover the
> proof, but that would imply something like 40% of the KE absorbed by
> the regenerative brakes could be recovered.
> 
> An Analysis of Hybrid Electric Propulsion Systems for Transit Buses
> Milestone Completion Re****t by O’Keefe and Vertin of the
> National Renewable Energy Laboratory
> http://tinyurl.com/292xyt
gives the efficiency of regenerative braking
> as 49-50% at best and 39% as current practice.
 




 20 Posts in Topic:
Re: regenerative braking
"Androcles" <  2008-02-03 11:52:51 
Re: regenerative braking
John Bailey <john_bail  2008-02-03 09:06:42 
Re: regenerative braking
"Androcles" <  2008-02-03 16:19:06 
Re: regenerative braking
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-04 10:17:12 
Re: regenerative braking
John Bailey <john_bail  2008-02-05 08:47:03 
Re: regenerative braking
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com   2008-02-05 18:03:19 
Re: regenerative braking
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com   2008-02-05 21:01:11 
Re: regenerative braking
"HLS" <nospa  2008-02-06 09:18:00 
Re: regenerative braking
John Popelish <jpopeli  2008-02-05 23:22:15 
Re: regenerative braking
Evgenij Barsukov <evge  2008-02-04 10:42:13 
Re: regenerative braking
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-06 14:21:09 
Re: regenerative braking
"Androcles" <  2008-02-06 21:13:54 
Re: regenerative braking
Evgenij Barsukov <evge  2008-02-06 15:18:14 
Re: regenerative braking
"Androcles" <  2008-02-07 09:02:58 
Re: regenerative braking
Evgenij Barsukov <evge  2008-02-07 12:40:17 
Re: regenerative braking
"Androcles" <  2008-02-08 09:36:39 
Re: regenerative braking
"Dirk Van de moortel  2008-02-08 19:26:55 
Re: regenerative braking
Evgenij Barsukov <evge  2008-02-06 14:45:41 
Re: regenerative braking
Evgenij Barsukov <evge  2008-02-04 09:23:41 
Re: regenerative braking
Nate Nagel <njnagel@[E  2008-02-06 17:17:27 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 4:44:13 CST 2008.