"Steve Austin" <saustin4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:481ba037$0$3351$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> bob urz wrote:
>> how good or bad of a motor is a 2.4 gm twin cam LD9?
>> Is it just a quad four with some of its issues solved?
>>
>> Bob
>
> My rule of thumb is- if it has four cylinders and GM made it, then it's
> crap.
Now that you mention it, I can't think of any series of 4 cylinder they
ever
made that was very good.
The Nova silicon aluminum one was terrible, the Iron Duke was faulty and
cracked,
the Quad Four had problems, etc...
Did they EVER make a really good, strong 4 cylinder??
|
