Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Automotive Technology and Advice > Re: air - fuel ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 14 of 44 Topic 21269 of 21749
Post > Topic >>

Re: air - fuel ratio

by Dyno <dyno@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 6, 2008 at 07:40 PM

Nate Nagel wrote:
> jim wrote:
>>
>> HLS wrote:
>>
>>> "Tegger" <tegger@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>
>>>> Then MTBE is about twice as efficient as ethanol, so the mixture can
be
>>>> leaner?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Tegger
>>>
>>> "Lean", to me, indicates  a mixture which does not have an excess of 
>>> fuel,
>>> or may
>>> even have an excess of the oxidant.
>>>
>>> It requires more oxygen to burn a unit amount of MTBE than it does to 
>>> burn
>>> the same unit amount of ethanol, and the energy released is
consequently
>>> greater.
>>
>>
>> Not according to the EPA. They say it contains less energy than ethanol
>> per gallon. Density might be different but doesn't matter - no one
>> purchases liquid fuel by weight.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Most of the energy is derived from the oxidation of the hydrogen 
>>> atoms in a
>>> hydrocarbon
>>> to form water.  Less energy is derived from oxidation of the carbon 
>>> to give
>>> CO2.
>>>
>>> The oxygen (in oxygenates such as alcohol and MTBE) just occupies 
>>> space and
>>> doesnt
>>> contribute to the energy derived from combustion.  So, since the 
>>> ethanol has
>>> a higher percentage of oxygen in the molecule, it has a lower amount
of
>>> energy that it can contribute
>>> upon combustion.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> The "octane rating" takes into account different properties of the 
>>> fuel, not
>>> directly related to
>>> the stoichiometry.
>>
>>
>> But octane is far more im****tant to fuel economy and performance. That
is
>> more im****tant to how much energy goes to the wheels.
Jim,
Octane rating has very little to do with fuel economy. Performance, yes.
>>
>> According to the EPA Ethanol and MTBE are almost the same for oxygen
>> content, octane and energy content. According to the EPA it takes 10
>> percent ethanol to get the same oxygen as 11 percent MTBE.
>>
>> -Jim
>>
>>
>> ----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet 
>> News==----
>> http://www.pronews.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 
>> Newsgroups
>> ---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
> 
> the amount of oxygen required to stoiciometrically burn a unit of fuel 
> is not directly related to the energy yielded by that process.  those 
> are two different properties of a fuel.
> 
> nate
> 
You probably meant the amount of energy "liberated" when burning; it's 
an exothermic reaction after all.

LHV - Gasoline: 42 MJ/Kg
LHV - Ethanol: 26.68 MJ/Kg
LHV - Methanol: 19.95 MJ/Kg
LHV - MBTE: 35.12 MJ/Kg

For 1 kg of air here are some interesting data.
Terms: LHV - lower heating value (liquid fuel into reaction, uncondensed 
water va**** in exhaust). The blend energy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 is the theoretical yield 
from a reaction using one kg of air and stoichiometric amount of fuel.

	Blend	Blend	Blend
EtOH %	Stoic	LHV	energy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 %	Stoic	LHV	energy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 not shown above, in all cases if the amount of air is reduced to 
maintain constant energy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 more fuel is still needed for all three 
oxygenates as the percentage increases.
 




 44 Posts in Topic:
air - fuel ratio
BobJ <jonroq@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-04 08:21:29 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Dyno <dyno@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-04 10:49:33 
Re: air - fuel ratio
BobJ <jonroq@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-04 17:36:22 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Tegger <tegger@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 23:29:14 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Dyno <dyno@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-04 19:57:56 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-04 21:16:24 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Tegger <tegger@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 11:54:56 
Re: air - fuel ratio
"HLS" <nospa  2008-05-05 15:53:46 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Tegger <tegger@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 23:37:52 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Dyno <dyno@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-06 01:46:50 
Re: air - fuel ratio
"HLS" <nospa  2008-05-06 06:13:44 
Re: air - fuel ratio
jim <".sjedgingN0  2008-05-06 16:51:46 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Nate Nagel <njnagel@[E  2008-05-06 18:22:20 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Dyno <dyno@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-06 19:40:41 
Re: air - fuel ratio
jim <".sjedgingN0  2008-05-06 19:00:59 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Dyno <dyno@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 00:20:13 
Re: air - fuel ratio
jim <".sjedgingN0  2008-05-07 10:11:17 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Stan Weiss <srweiss@[E  2008-05-07 11:25:31 
Re: air - fuel ratio
jim <".sjedgingN0  2008-05-07 10:59:21 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Tegger <tegger@[EMAIL   2008-05-06 23:13:53 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Don Stauffer in Minnesota  2008-05-07 06:41:28 
Re: air - fuel ratio
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 08:35:38 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Dyno <dyno@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 13:13:09 
Re: air - fuel ratio
jim <".sjedgingN0  2008-05-07 17:11:02 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Dyno <dyno@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 19:05:15 
Re: air - fuel ratio
jim <".sjedgingN0  2008-05-07 21:50:02 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Dyno <dyno@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 09:34:07 
Re: air - fuel ratio
jim <".sjedgingN0  2008-05-08 12:23:08 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Dyno <dyno@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 13:36:03 
Re: air - fuel ratio
jim <".sjedgingN0  2008-05-08 20:29:35 
Re: air - fuel ratio
jim <".sjedgingN0  2008-05-07 14:12:17 
Re: air - fuel ratio
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 12:45:06 
Re: air - fuel ratio
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 15:52:10 
Re: air - fuel ratio
jim <".sjedgingN0  2008-05-07 16:46:30 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Nate Nagel <njnagel@[E  2008-05-08 07:28:41 
Re: air - fuel ratio
"Mortimer" <  2008-05-08 12:45:38 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Dyno <dyno@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 09:48:44 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Don Stauffer in Minnesota  2008-05-08 07:24:33 
Re: air - fuel ratio
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-08 10:47:30 
Re: air - fuel ratio
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-08 10:50:54 
Re: air - fuel ratio
z <gzuckier@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-08 12:16:03 
Re: air - fuel ratio
"Mortimer" <  2008-05-08 22:45:26 
Re: air - fuel ratio
Dyno <dyno@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 18:44:49 
Re: air - fuel ratio
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-09 08:05:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 12:38:21 CDT 2008.