Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Automotive Technology and Advice > Re: Stupid "fre...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 2 Topic 21297 of 21743
Post > Topic >>

Re: Stupid "free energy" idea

by "Wayne Dobson" <noname@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 06:10 PM

travisgod@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>> Ah, I see what you're saying: you're prepared to accelerate down the
>> hill to a speed above what you were doing on the flat, and let that
>> carry you part of the way up the hill on the far side. Yes, I agree:
>> coating in neutral will involve less braking so you'll go further up
>> the other side before you have to go back on the power.
>
> Yes, accelerate insofar as highway RPM engine pumping losses are a
> deceleration.

It isn't at all.  So that would be insofar as not at all.

-- 
Wayne Dobson
AKA "Dobbie The House Elf"
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
"travisgod@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-08 10:08:24 
Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
"Wayne Dobson"   2008-05-08 18:10:25 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 22:25:27 CDT 2008.